Re: [gentoo-dev] atom matching behavior

2006-08-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 03 August 2006 01:44, Harald van Dijk wrote: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 07:07:35AM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: > > Repost from gentoo-portage-dev[1]: > > > > Was just brought to my attention that the =* operator doesn't work as I > > thought, as for example =foo-1.2* matches foo-1.20 as we

Re: [gentoo-dev] atom matching behavior

2006-08-03 Thread Stephen Bennett
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 07:07:35 +0200 Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Opinions? Current behaviour is sub-optimal in many regards, but the tree relies upon it; amongst other examples, packages depending upon =autoconf-2.5* expect to get 2.59. If someone wants to 'fix' all of those, and any o

Re: [gentoo-dev] atom matching behavior

2006-08-03 Thread Marius Mauch
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:59:01 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 07:07:35 +0200 Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | "* means match any version of the package so long as the > specified | base is matched" > | > | can be read both ways. > | > | Opinion

Re: [gentoo-dev] atom matching behavior

2006-08-03 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 07:07:35 +0200 Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | "* means match any version of the package so long as the specified | base is matched" | | can be read both ways. | | Opinions? Oooh! I have opinions! If you're changing the dep behaviour, you might as well just do it

Re: [gentoo-dev] atom matching behavior

2006-08-03 Thread Joshua Nichols
Marius Mauch wrote: > Repost from gentoo-portage-dev[1]: > > Was just brought to my attention that the =* operator doesn't work as I > thought, as for example =foo-1.2* matches foo-1.20 as well as foo-1.2.3. > This wouldn't be a bug problem if it could be used as a general glob > operator like with

Re: [gentoo-dev] atom matching behavior

2006-08-03 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Thursday 03 August 2006 07:07, Marius Mauch wrote: > Opinions? I actually tried to brought this in a few times, and mostly I was either ignored or told to live with it I think. But I agree with you in requiring a solution. As Harald said, changing the behaviour "in the run" isn't a funny choi

Re: [gentoo-dev] atom matching behavior

2006-08-02 Thread Harald van Dijk
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 07:07:35AM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: > Repost from gentoo-portage-dev[1]: > > Was just brought to my attention that the =* operator doesn't work as I > thought, as for example =foo-1.2* matches foo-1.20 as well as foo-1.2.3. > This wouldn't be a bug problem if it could be

[gentoo-dev] atom matching behavior

2006-08-02 Thread Marius Mauch
Repost from gentoo-portage-dev[1]: Was just brought to my attention that the =* operator doesn't work as I thought, as for example =foo-1.2* matches foo-1.20 as well as foo-1.2.3. This wouldn't be a bug problem if it could be used as a general glob operator like with =foo-1.2.*, but it's use is st