* Doug Klima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-26 19:19]:
> Howdy all,
Hey Doug!
> As some people might have noticed, I've wanted to bring Asterisk 1.4 to
> the tree proper.
++ on that from me :)
> The big holdup is the zaptel ebuild, which needs to be
> revamped and brought in as well for the 1.4.x
Howdy all,
As some people might have noticed, I've wanted to bring Asterisk 1.4 to
the tree proper. The big holdup is the zaptel ebuild, which needs to be
revamped and brought in as well for the 1.4.x series. I've already
rewritten most of it, the only issue is I don't have hardware to test
(nor d
Vitaly Oborsky wrote:
> Good afternoon. Gentoo it is the best. You know it:) the Question. In
> potrage there is such remarkable package as asterisk. Its newest
> version at present 1.2. X. Several months ago there was a stable new
> branch asterisk, with number of version 1.4. X, me interests, whe
> potrage there is such remarkable package as asterisk. Its newest
> version at present 1.2. X. Several months ago there was a stable new
> branch asterisk, with number of version 1.4. X, me interests, whether
1.4 Branch is in beta stage.
> inclusion of this version in portage is planned? If yes,
Vitaly Oborsky wrote:
Good afternoon. Gentoo it is the best. You know it:) the Question. In
potrage there is such remarkable package as asterisk. Its newest
version at present 1.2. X. Several months ago there was a stable new
branch asterisk, with number of version 1.4. X, me interests, whether
Good afternoon. Gentoo it is the best. You know it:) the Question. In
potrage there is such remarkable package as asterisk. Its newest
version at present 1.2. X. Several months ago there was a stable new
branch asterisk, with number of version 1.4. X, me interests, whether
inclusion of this versio
