El mié, 09-10-2013 a las 20:54 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
[...]
> I meant that for long as desktop-wm@ herd is there, it should be used
>
> But you have a very good point, the desktop-wm@ herd has been quiet for
> years and it's one of those herds that doesn't make sense because no
> maint
On 09/10/13 20:42, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mié, 09-10-2013 a las 20:34 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
[...]
Will proceed to move its packages to maintainer-needed in a week if it
keeps being empty then
Move the x11-wm/afterstep package to desktop-wm@ and x11-plugins/ ones
to desktop-dock@
Ditt
El mié, 09-10-2013 a las 20:34 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
[...]
> > Will proceed to move its packages to maintainer-needed in a week if it
> > keeps being empty then
>
> Move the x11-wm/afterstep package to desktop-wm@ and x11-plugins/ ones
> to desktop-dock@
> Ditto for net-mail/asmail whi
On 09/10/13 20:20, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El vie, 04-10-2013 a las 10:23 +0200, Bernard Cafarelli escribió:
I just removed myself from this herd (not enough time and I have not
used Afterstep for a long long time), feel free to join if you are an
Afterstep user!
Open bugs currently include fixing s
El vie, 04-10-2013 a las 10:23 +0200, Bernard Cafarelli escribió:
> I just removed myself from this herd (not enough time and I have not
> used Afterstep for a long long time), feel free to join if you are an
> Afterstep user!
>
> Open bugs currently include fixing some ignored LDFLAGS, a compil
I just removed myself from this herd (not enough time and I have not
used Afterstep for a long long time), feel free to join if you are an
Afterstep user!
Open bugs currently include fixing some ignored LDFLAGS, a compilation
failure in libafterimage, and a version bump for afterstep itself
