On 05/07/2012 11:24 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 05/07/2012 12:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
I propose:
REQUIRED_USE="== ( qt webkit )"
But this just means that the ebuild has redundant USE flags, so one of
them shouldn't be in IUSE, in the firs
On 05/07/2012 09:07 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 07 May 2012 20:58:18 -0700
> Zac Medico wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 05/07/2012 08:50 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> On Mon, 07 May 2012 14:41:33 -0700 Zac Medico
>>> wrote:
>>>
On 05/07/2012 01:43 P
On Mon, 07 May 2012 20:58:18 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/07/2012 08:50 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Mon, 07 May 2012 14:41:33 -0700 Zac Medico
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/07/2012 01:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 07 May 2012 13:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/07/2012 08:50 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 07 May 2012 14:41:33 -0700 Zac Medico
> wrote:
>
>> On 05/07/2012 01:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> On Mon, 07 May 2012 13:24:31 -0700 Zac Medico
>>> wrote:
>>>
On 05/07/2012 12:18 PM, Ulri
On Mon, 07 May 2012 14:41:33 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 05/07/2012 01:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Mon, 07 May 2012 13:24:31 -0700
> > Zac Medico wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/07/2012 12:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> >>>
> I propose:
>
On 05/06/2012 12:52 PM, Davide Pesavento wrote:
> On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 2:34 AM, hasufell wrote:
>> # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l
>> 33
>>
>> I would vote to make this a global useflag:
>>
>> webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module
>>
>
> I suggest the following description:
On Mon, 07 May 2012 14:41:33 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> What if '!webkit? ( !qt )' also applies though? As an alternative to
> listing both constraints separately, you could combine them as '^^ (
> webkit !qt )', or add support for '== ( qt webkit )' to make the
> expression easier to read.
Forget
On 05/07/2012 01:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 07 May 2012 13:24:31 -0700
> Zac Medico wrote:
>
>> On 05/07/2012 12:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>>
I propose:
>>>
REQUIRED_USE="== ( qt webkit )"
>>>
>>> But this just means
On Mon, 07 May 2012 13:24:31 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 05/07/2012 12:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >> On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> >
> >> I propose:
> >
> >> REQUIRED_USE="== ( qt webkit )"
> >
> > But this just means that the ebuild has redundant USE flags, so one
On 05/07/2012 12:33 PM, Stelian Ionescu wrote:
> Isn't it the time to make a new EAPI which no longer has USE "flags" but
> USE "values" ? Many of the really weird USE flags combinations would be
> much more clearly expressed if the possible types for a USE variable
> were:
> 1) member-of: for choo
On 05/07/2012 12:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
>> I propose:
>
>> REQUIRED_USE="== ( qt webkit )"
>
> But this just means that the ebuild has redundant USE flags, so one of
> them shouldn't be in IUSE, in the first place.
It serves to conve
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 11:11 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 05/06/2012 05:47 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> > 2012-05-06 02:34:26 hasufell napisał(a):
> >> # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l
> >> 33
> >>
> >> I would vote to make this a global useflag:
> >>
> >> webkit - Adds sup
> On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> I propose:
> REQUIRED_USE="== ( qt webkit )"
But this just means that the ebuild has redundant USE flags, so one of
them shouldn't be in IUSE, in the first place.
Ulrich
On 05/07/2012 11:26 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> REQUIRED_USE="webkit? ( gtk ) !webkit? ( !gtk ) gtk? ( webkit ) !gtk? (
>> !webkit )"
>
>> It's pretty awkward with the existing operators, but we could extend
>> the REQUIRED_USE syntax to support an equivalent operator in a
>> future EAPI.
>
> As
On Mon, 7 May 2012 20:26:08 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> REQUIRED_USE="^^ ( webkit !qt )"
Please provide an algorithm that will turn that into an appropriate
error message for displaying to a user.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> On Mon, 07 May 2012, Zac Medico wrote:
> Another possible way to model this kind of relationship would be to
> us REQUIRED_USE to enforce relationships with the qt and gtk flags:
> REQUIRED_USE="webkit? ( qt ) !webkit? ( !qt ) qt? ( webkit ) !qt? (
> !webkit )"
This line just says that eit
On Mon, 07 May 2012 11:11:04 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> REQUIRED_USE="webkit? ( qt ) !webkit? ( !qt ) qt? ( webkit ) !qt? (
> !webkit )"
Why do you need to write it both ways?
> It's pretty awkward with the existing operators, but we could extend
> the REQUIRED_USE syntax to support an equivalent
On 05/06/2012 05:47 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> 2012-05-06 02:34:26 hasufell napisał(a):
>> # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l
>> 33
>>
>> I would vote to make this a global useflag:
>>
>> webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module
>
> I suggest to use separate qt-
On 05/07/2012 04:00 AM, hasufell wrote:
On 05/07/2012 02:47 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
2012-05-06 02:34:26 hasufell napisał(a):
# grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33
I would vote to make this a global useflag:
webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module
I sugg
So we have 31 packages that can optionally support webkit, and none of them
lets you choose between the qt and gtk branches at compile time. I fail to
see the benefit of splitting the flag.
---
Jesús Guerrero Botella
El 07/05/2012 05:16, "Ben" escribió:
> On 7 May 2012 08:47, Arfrever Frehtes Ta
On 7 May 2012 08:47, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
> I suggest to use separate qt-webkit (or webkit-qt) and webkit-gtk USE flags.
I don't think that is necessary.
Ben | yngwin
2012-05-07 03:00:31 hasufell napisał(a):
> On 05/07/2012 02:47 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> > 2012-05-06 02:34:26 hasufell napisał(a):
> >> # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33
> >>
> >> I would vote to make this a global useflag:
> >>
> >> webkit - Adds support for the we
On 05/07/2012 02:47 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> 2012-05-06 02:34:26 hasufell napisał(a):
>> # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33
>>
>> I would vote to make this a global useflag:
>>
>> webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module
>
> I suggest to use separate qt-w
2012-05-06 02:34:26 hasufell napisał(a):
> # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l
> 33
>
> I would vote to make this a global useflag:
>
> webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module
I suggest to use separate qt-webkit (or webkit-qt) and webkit-gtk USE flags.
--
Arfrever Frehtes Taifers
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 2:34 AM, hasufell wrote:
> # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l
> 33
>
> I would vote to make this a global useflag:
>
> webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module
>
I suggest the following description:
"Add support for the WebKit HTML rendering/layout engine."
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/06/2012 02:55 AM, Ben wrote:
> On 6 May 2012 08:34, hasufell wrote:
>> # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33
>>
>> I would vote to make this a global useflag:
>>
>> webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module
>>
>
> IIRC this wa
On 6 May 2012 08:34, hasufell wrote:
> # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l
> 33
>
> I would vote to make this a global useflag:
>
> webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module
>
IIRC this was already voted on ~2 years ago (before I retired). It's
just waiting for someone to implement it
# grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l
33
I would vote to make this a global useflag:
webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module
28 matches
Mail list logo
