Mike Auty schrieb:
Installation will proceed, but the user will get a big fat warning that
the sys-fs/zfs package is potentially broken.
This seems like a sure-fire way to make users paranoid and/or
desensitized? People will learn to ignore warnings if we make them big
red and flashing but the
> On Sep 12, 2018, at 8:23 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
> wrote:
>
> Rich Freeman schrieb:
>>> Requirements:
>>>
>>> * Do not fail to build/install when a warning is encountered
>> On a particularly critical package like a filesystem, wouldn't we want
>> to still fail to install when a w
Hiya,
On 13/09/2018 01:23, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Installation will proceed, but the user will get a big fat warning that
> the sys-fs/zfs package is potentially broken.
This seems like a sure-fire way to make users paranoid and/or
desensitized? People will learn to ignore warning
Rich Freeman schrieb:
If the user recognizes this as a critical package, then they can do the
research before deciding on whether to use the package as is, attempt to
downgrade, or wait until a fix is released.
But, you've ALREADY overwritten the previous version of the package
that presumably
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 8:23 PM Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
wrote:
>
> Rich Freeman schrieb:
> >> Requirements:
> >>
> >> * Do not fail to build/install when a warning is encountered
> >
> > On a particularly critical package like a filesystem, wouldn't we want
> > to still fail to install when a
Rich Freeman schrieb:
Requirements:
* Do not fail to build/install when a warning is encountered
On a particularly critical package like a filesystem, wouldn't we want
to still fail to install when a warning is encountered?
Installation will proceed, but the user will get a big fat warning t
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:35 PM Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
wrote:
>
>
> Requirements:
>
> * Do not fail to build/install when a warning is encountered
On a particularly critical package like a filesystem, wouldn't we want
to still fail to install when a warning is encountered?
> Also possible
Hi!
So from the discussion I gather that -Werror has both desirable and
undesirable effects. Question is, can we somehow mitigate the undesirable
effects while still retaining the desirable effects as much as possible?
Requirements:
* Bother the user enough that they will report the problem,
