On 11/14/2012 06:17 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> so unless you are willing to go that far as introducing yourself at the
>> xfce devel mailing list and accepting the mantle of upstream of them, we
>> are really stuck at this distribution level patching just like others
>
>
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> so unless you are willing to go that far as introducing yourself at the
> xfce devel mailing list and accepting the mantle of upstream of them, we
> are really stuck at this distribution level patching just like others
That makes no sense to me. If you (not you specifica
On 14/11/12 12:36, Peter Stuge wrote:
It also means that if I had strong interest in XFCE then I would work
on getting patches from other distribution upstream, so that Gentoo
did not need to have any patches at all.
I also want to clarify that *everything* we have for XFCE in gentoo-x86
now *
On 14/11/12 12:36, Peter Stuge wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
I'm just afraid our XFCE port gets lagged behind because of this as
compared to other distros ...
I am, as you know, a strong proponent of doing things right, rather
than doing them fast.
In this case that means that it is not the e
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> I'm just afraid our XFCE port gets lagged behind because of this as
> compared to other distros ...
I am, as you know, a strong proponent of doing things right, rather
than doing them fast.
In this case that means that it is not the end of the world if Gentoo
ebuilds do
Everything printed by ...
http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/genrdeps/rindex/xfce-base/libxfcegui4
... if not fixed already by an ~arch version needs a patch that ports it
from libxfcegui4 to libxfce4ui
These patches are available mainly at ...
http://bugzilla.xfce.org/ (anything submitted
