Re: [gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.1 is Stable

2006-10-17 Thread Caleb Cushing
I was running evdev under Xorg 7.0 and 7.1 for my mouse without problems. It works if you use it the way they intend it to use it. Read the man page. Otherwise yea it will crash. I used it under 7.0 fine but when I upgraded to 7.1 it started causing xorg to crash on startup same configuration

Re: [gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.1 is Stable

2006-10-16 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 22:16 +0200, Simon Strandman wrote: > Chris Gianelloni skrev: > > On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 17:28 -0600, Joshua Baergen wrote: > > > >> I also add that many, many bugs were fixed. To run Compiz using AIGLX, > >> xorg-server must be build with the "aiglx" USE-flag. This is kno

Re: [gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.1 is Stable

2006-10-16 Thread Simon Strandman
Chris Gianelloni skrev: On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 17:28 -0600, Joshua Baergen wrote: I also add that many, many bugs were fixed. To run Compiz using AIGLX, xorg-server must be build with the "aiglx" USE-flag. This is known to cause some EXA slowdowns (bug #147841). Just as an aside, this

Re: [gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.1 is Stable

2006-10-16 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 17:28 -0600, Joshua Baergen wrote: > I also add that many, many bugs were fixed. To run Compiz using AIGLX, > xorg-server must be build with the "aiglx" USE-flag. This is known to > cause some EXA slowdowns (bug #147841). Just as an aside, this isn't needed for NVIDIA folks

Re: [gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.1 is Stable

2006-10-16 Thread Olivier Crête
On Mon, 2006-16-10 at 07:37 -0400, Caleb Cushing wrote: > is evdev (for 7.1) stable now? and by stable I mean can I use it > without it crashing xorg? I should probably test this because I don't > recall it getting updated which means it is still broken. It works if you use it the way they intend

Re: [gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.1 is Stable

2006-10-16 Thread Christoph Mende
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 07:37 -0400, Caleb Cushing wrote: > is evdev (for 7.1) stable now? and by stable I mean can I use it > without it crashing xorg? I should probably test this because I don't > recall it getting updated which means it is still broken. I was running evdev under Xorg 7.0 and 7.1

Re: [gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.1 is Stable

2006-10-16 Thread Caleb Cushing
is evdev (for 7.1) stable now? and by stable I mean can I use it without it crashing xorg? I should probably test this because I don't recall it getting updated which means it is still broken. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.1 is Stable

2006-10-15 Thread Pablo Yanez Trujillo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I updated my xorg yesterday. > Does it build? yes > Does it run? yes > Will it damage your system? I don't think so, my system survived the update ;) Pablo Pablo Yánez Trujillo http://klingsor.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/ Joshua Baergen wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.1 is Stable

2006-10-13 Thread Joshua Baergen
Note that this applies to AMD64/x86 only. Many platforms have had this stable for awhile, and some still have 7.1 in the testing tree. Joshua Baergen signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.1 is Stable

2006-10-13 Thread Joshua Baergen
X.Org 7.1 has been released from its binary driver jail to the (un?)stable masses! Does it build? Only on Tuesdays! Does it run? Often! Will it damage your system? I like cheese! A summary of new features, quoted from the GWN: "This release features the addition of accelerated indirect GLX (