Op di 2 jun. 2020 om 19:51 schreef Alec Warner :
>
> The conclusion was that the software needed to be released under an open
> license (preferably FSF / OSI approved.) So for example, Gitlab CE is OK
> (its an OSI approved licensed) but Gitlab EE is not. The source for Gitlab
> EE is open (I can
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:44 AM Mathy Vanvoorden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry I'm a bit late to the party here but was behind on my emails.
>
> Op wo 27 mei 2020 om 05:25 schreef Alec Warner :
>
>> The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting
>> together demos of CI services and th
Op di 2 jun. 2020 om 10:47 schreef Michał Górny :
> 1. This is not free software.
>
It was not clear for me if this was a requirement or not. The license is
free for open source projects. I don't see the difference between companies
offering CE versions of their commercial products, they also "ta
On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 10:44 +0200, Mathy Vanvoorden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry I'm a bit late to the party here but was behind on my emails.
>
> Op wo 27 mei 2020 om 05:25 schreef Alec Warner :
>
> > The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting
> > together demos of CI services
Hi,
Sorry I'm a bit late to the party here but was behind on my emails.
Op wo 27 mei 2020 om 05:25 schreef Alec Warner :
> The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting
> together demos of CI services and things like gitlab / gitea / gerrit and
> so on.
>
>
I didn't see in t
On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 18:42 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:17 PM Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 16:34 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> > > The pull-based mirroring is a bit sad, as it would be nice to auto-update
> > > some forks, but it's not a killer feature.
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:17 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 16:34 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> > The pull-based mirroring is a bit sad, as it would be nice to auto-update
> > some forks, but it's not a killer feature.
>
> Exactly. Especially that our push-based mirroring is bette
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 04:34:24PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> Another major issue is operating the software. I haven't found anyone to
> *run* gitlab; I'm not eager to do it. Today Gentoo is mostly distributed,
> bugs are in bugzilla, wiki is on mediawiki, code is on gitolite with N
> mirrors, ema
On Wed, 27 May 2020 01:28:02 -0700
Alec Warner wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 1:09 AM Brian Dolbec
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 26 May 2020 20:24:56 -0700
> > Alec Warner wrote:
> >
> > > The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting
> > > together demos of CI services and t
On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 16:34 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> The pull-based mirroring is a bit sad, as it would be nice to auto-update
> some forks, but it's not a killer feature.
Exactly. Especially that our push-based mirroring is better,
and I think that's how we want to populate it.
> I think ou
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 2:31 PM Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 1:14 AM Alec Warner wrote:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020, 23:08 Michał Górny wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 20:24 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> >> > The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting
>
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 1:14 AM Alec Warner wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020, 23:08 Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 20:24 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
>> > The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting together
>> > demos of CI services and things like gitlab / gite
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:16 AM Thomas Deutschmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is this really CI _vs_ Code Review? I.e. we can only have one?
>
I'll try to come back to this. We can make computers do anything, but it's
a question of limited time for me and for Gentoo as a whole.
>
> CI is nice and helpfu
On 27/05/2020 15:22, Guilherme Amadio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 02:45:29PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote:
>> On 5/27/20 2:16 PM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>>> The problem when doing review on Github
>>> for me is, that we usually create new revisions. Therefore we don't see
>>> what's
Hi,
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 02:45:29PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote:
> On 5/27/20 2:16 PM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> > The problem when doing review on Github
> > for me is, that we usually create new revisions. Therefore we don't see
> > what's changed in new revision versus previous revision.
On 5/27/20 2:16 PM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> The problem when doing review on Github
> for me is, that we usually create new revisions. Therefore we don't see
> what's changed in new revision versus previous revision.
That's my main concern with the current behaviour: a "git diff" often doesn't
Hi,
is this really CI _vs_ Code Review? I.e. we can only have one?
CI is nice and helpful. For example I usually don't start review until CI
sets green light but CI alone wouldn't be enough. Thought that Gitlab will
support same kind of hooks similar to how current CI is integrated into
Github, n
> Works great for whom? How many deployments are we talking about? To be
> honest, I don't think I've stumbled upon a single instance.
> On the other hand, GitLab deployments are pretty common -- GNOME, Xfce,
> Debian come instantly to my mind. Then, there's Heptapod -- the GitLab
> fork for Mer
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 1:09 AM Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2020 20:24:56 -0700
> Alec Warner wrote:
>
> > The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting
> > together demos of CI services and things like gitlab / gitea / gerrit
> > and so on.
> >
> > Some of these co
On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 01:14 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020, 23:08 Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 20:24 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> > > The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting
> > together
> > > demos of CI services and things like gitl
On Tue, May 26, 2020, 23:08 Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 20:24 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> > The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting
> together
> > demos of CI services and things like gitlab / gitea / gerrit and so on.
> >
> > Some of these come in combi
On Tue, 26 May 2020 20:24:56 -0700
Alec Warner wrote:
> The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting
> together demos of CI services and things like gitlab / gitea / gerrit
> and so on.
>
> Some of these come in combined (e.g. gitlab offers repo hosting, code
> review / pul
On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 20:24 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting together
> demos of CI services and things like gitlab / gitea / gerrit and so on.
>
> Some of these come in combined (e.g. gitlab offers repo hosting, code
> review / pull re
The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting together
demos of CI services and things like gitlab / gitea / gerrit and so on.
Some of these come in combined (e.g. gitlab offers repo hosting, code
review / pull reqs, CI services, and deploy services.) Some of these are
pieceme
24 matches
Mail list logo
