On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 19:45:44 +0100
Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
> On 03/24/10 11:28, Michał Górny wrote:
> > 3. ESCM_LIVE_FAIL_IF_REPO_NOT_UPDATED (similar to the one in
> > git.eclass)
> > - a common switch to force unpack() phase to fail if no updates
> > were found during the pull/update.
>
On 03/24/10 11:28, Michał Górny wrote:
> As suggested by ssuominen on bug #311101, I am posting the issue
> to the mailing list.
>
> Currently, various SCM eclasses differ very much in the subset
> of features and control variables implemented. The idea is to establish
> a single subset of such va
As suggested by ssuominen on bug #311101, I am posting the issue
to the mailing list.
Currently, various SCM eclasses differ very much in the subset
of features and control variables implemented. The idea is to establish
a single subset of such variables and rules for all SCM eclasses
to follow, a
