On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan
wrote:
>
> use cairo && built_with_use category/cairo X
> use avahi && built_with_use net-dns/avahi gtk
Oops, sorry, I misunderstood what you were saying; I agree; most of
the cases are of the type
use1? ( cat/pkg1[use2] )
!use1? ( )
And if use1
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:28 PM, David Leverton
wrote:
> On Sunday 04 January 2009 16:48:38 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
>> On the contrary, the reverse of what you say is true. A simple grep of
>> the tree showed that:
>
> In how many of those ebuilds would the long form be
>use1? ( cat/pkg[use2]
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 22:18:38 +0530
"Nirbheek Chauhan" wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:34:18 +0530
> > "Nirbheek Chauhan" wrote:
> >> How about this:
> >
> > It's utterly useless. Unlike the existing shortcut forms, what
> > you're after
On Sunday 04 January 2009 16:48:38 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On the contrary, the reverse of what you say is true. A simple grep of
> the tree showed that:
In how many of those ebuilds would the long form be
use1? ( cat/pkg[use2] )
rather than
use1? ( cat/pkg[use2] ) !use1? ( cat/pkg )
?
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:34:18 +0530
> "Nirbheek Chauhan" wrote:
>> How about this:
>
> It's utterly useless. Unlike the existing shortcut forms, what you're
> after isn't widely enough used to warrant its own shortcut. Use the
> expanded form
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:34:18 +0530
"Nirbheek Chauhan" wrote:
> How about this:
>
> New syntaxExpanded syntax
> Extension of
>
> pkg[foo?bar] foo? ( cat/pkg
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> This is all nice but i had one issue which was like this:
> i have package with use foo and package2 with use bar
> and package with foo depend on package2 with bar.
>
> so this is not eapi2 incely handleable, what i would like to do is using
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:46:06 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> This is all nice but i had one issue which was like this:
> i have package with use foo and package2 with use bar
> and package with foo depend on package2 with bar.
>
> so this is not eapi2 incely handleable, what i would like to do is
> u
Dne neděle 04 Leden 2009 16:34:02 Nirbheek Chauhan napsal(a):
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Christian Faulhammer
wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > regarding USE dependencies what is the correct way if a package needs
> > one out of two USE flags?
> >
> > || ( cat-egory/package[foo] cat-egory/package[bar
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> regarding USE dependencies what is the correct way if a package needs
> one out of two USE flags?
>
> || ( cat-egory/package[foo] cat-egory/package[bar] )
>
That's the way right now as per portage EAPI=2 doc[1]
> or is there s
Hi,
regarding USE dependencies what is the correct way if a package needs
one out of two USE flags?
|| ( cat-egory/package[foo] cat-egory/package[bar] )
or is there something else?
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
11 matches
Mail list logo
