Re: [gentoo-dev] USE=desktop-file request

2016-01-09 Thread Mart Raudsepp
Ühel kenal päeval, K, 06.01.2016 kell 16:23, kirjutas tot-to: > I'm a user of a KISS wm, which does not provide Windows™-like menus, > desktop icons, etc. GUI software is called just by typing the binary > name in PATH, just like any other software. For me the desktop-files > are > some kind of use

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE=desktop-file request

2016-01-06 Thread Peter Stuge
Rich Freeman wrote: > I'm not sure it is really worth trying to control this via a USE flag > for such a light dependency. I don't care how light dependencies are - I want to be able to choose every single one that is optional. That is Gentoo's killer feature, and I am thoroughly disappointed when

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE=desktop-file request

2016-01-06 Thread Matthias Maier
> I'd have to check but I suspect that portage hangs onto build-time > dependencies by default, probably so that you're not uninstalling them > and reinstalling them anytime you do anything. Strictly speaking, > however, it would be safe to depclean anything that is only a > build-time dependency

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE=desktop-file request

2016-01-06 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:47 PM, tot-to wrote: > > It would be great to make the intallation of desktop-files optional, > but I mostly concerned about the dependency on > dev-util/desktop-file-utils... > > I think such dependency should be either removed, because it's not > really required or at le

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE=desktop-file request

2016-01-06 Thread tot-to
t least be optional. -Original Message- Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 21:59:47 +0300 From: Sergey Popov To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] USE=desktop-file request Unfortunately i doubt that we could help with that. I did not look into every software package from your list, b

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE=desktop-file request

2016-01-06 Thread Sergey Popov
Unfortunately i doubt that we could help with that. I did not look into every software package from your list, but many of those packages did not have compile time switch for (not)using desktop-file-utils. If you are still needed to clean up files, that cause no harm to your system - i can only su

[gentoo-dev] USE=desktop-file request

2016-01-06 Thread tot-to
I'm a user of a KISS wm, which does not provide Windows™-like menus, desktop icons, etc. GUI software is called just by typing the binary name in PATH, just like any other software. For me the desktop-files are some kind of useless junk. Recently a lot of software were made harddep on dev-util/des