Hello All,
this message is an update of:
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/4b2ef0e9aa7588224b8ae799c5fe31fa
What is changed in the meantime:
1) All operations on the bugzilla, about the sanity-check and so on are done
with the account stable-...@gentoo.org
So, if you want to filt
Hi all,
On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 22:55:27 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote:
[...]
> Another question: do we steel need to set STABLEREQ keyword for
> stabilization bugs? Since we now have a dedicated Stabilization
> component, STABLEREQ looks redundant.
Ping here.
Best regards,
Andrew Savchenko
pgpU78p
> On Sun, 25 Dec 2016, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> with the great and awesome work of Michael Palimaka (kensington) and
> the support of the wg-stable, for the stabilization process, some
> changes on our bugzilla have been done.
Thank you for the great work.
> [...]
> When you will choose on
On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 23:32:56 +0900
Aaron Bauman wrote:
> It is not necessary to use a file now. Just put the list in the "Atoms to
> stabilize" as described.
Well, to an extent it was more a problem I feel the *need* to use this feature
already ;)
Because I have some stuff that bumps into ut
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 20:49:02 +1300 Kent Fredric wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 22:55:27 +0300
>> Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Description how to test this package...
>> >
>>
>> Alternatively, why not have a metatag that just
>>
On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 20:49:02 +1300 Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 22:55:27 +0300
> Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>
> >
> > Description how to test this package...
> >
>
> Alternatively, why not have a metatag that just
> permits a valid URL that points to testing instructions?
Sounds g
On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 22:55:27 +0300
Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>
> Description how to test this package...
>
Alternatively, why not have a metatag that just
permits a valid URL that points to testing instructions?
Benefits:
* Multiple packages can share instructions without redundancy
* Edits
On 12/25/2016 02:55 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>
> What is a recommended way to describe how runtime testing should be
> done? Some packages are quite complex and it is desired not only to
> run them, but to run with some args or do some actions.
>
> Some ideas:
>
> ...
The Emacs team came up
Hi,
On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 13:41:29 +0100 Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> Runtime testing required (which is not mandatory) needs to be filled in the
> following way:
> - Yes, you are asking to run a package after have compiled/installed it.
> - No, you don't need runtime testing (e.g. packages that insta
On December 25, 2016 9:49:02 PM GMT+09:00, Kent Fredric
wrote:
>On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 13:41:29 +0100
>Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
>
>> NOTE: I'm intending this message as a sort of announcement to invite
>everyone
>> to port their stable requests. I guess there isn't much to discuss
>here. If
>> y
On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 13:41:29 +0100
Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> NOTE: I'm intending this message as a sort of announcement to invite everyone
> to port their stable requests. I guess there isn't much to discuss here. If
> you don't like some of the changes that have been done, please open a
> spe
Hello all.
with the great and awesome work of Michael Palimaka (kensington) and the
support of the wg-stable, for the stabilization process, some changes on our
bugzilla have been done.
We have two new components:
- Stabilization
- Keywording
When you will choose one of those, you will see two
12 matches
Mail list logo
