* Tobias Klausmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> People who use Sunrise as an overlay and then come whining to bgo
> about their failed ebuild can be told.
ACK. Sunrise and main Gentoo should have strictly separate
Bugzillas (or at least separate products).
BTW: my suggested bug reporting t
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 12:00 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> So you can create projects by creating a directory in
> gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en, you don't have to announce it (but it's
> polite to do so), and it may well conflict with other projects, that's okay.
>
> You can't blame them for followin
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 16:05 +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> > 2. [...] Therefore I do not believe that QA for a tree that is as
> > extensive as Sunrise done by a few 'official' developers amounts to
> > much real world quality.
>
> I would expect that over time, the Sunrise developers will learn m
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 03:55:44PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 07:07:31 -0700 Donnie Berkholz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | One could argue that since the metastructure policy was approved more
> | recently, anything in it that contradicts previous rules takes
> | prece
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 07:07:31 -0700 Donnie Berkholz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| One could argue that since the metastructure policy was approved more
| recently, anything in it that contradicts previous rules takes
| precedence. "Freedom to make new projects anytime" beats "must use
| GLEP for si
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 12:00:56 +0200 Thierry Carrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| So you can create projects by creating a directory in
| gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en, you don't have to announce it (but it's
| polite to do so), and it may well conflict with other projects,
| that's okay.
|
| You can't b
foser wrote:
> I checked back on the initial announcement, where it Sunrise was made
> public as an official Gentoo project without any prior discussion. The
> announcement actually stated 'This is an announcement - No flamewars
> allowed'. I guess the creators were already aware of the feelings o
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:25:20 +0200
foser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> 1. Stale ebuilds are often stale for a reason, there is obviously not
> enough interest to add and maintain them. Not just on the developer
> side, but also on the user side. If someone really cared enough
> he/she would
On 8/1/06, Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# emerge --submit-info
* sys-apps/portage generates emerge --info output and uploads it
relatively tamper-proof to tickets.g.o, and
* returns a ticket to the user, a unique number that he or she can
communicate to developers and active users
Hi!
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:21:53 +0200
> > Idea: should it be more obvious in emerge --info and ebuild
> > failure that an overlay is involved? If it's obvious enough,
> > I don't see a problem. Also, a command that lists all
> > installed packages that
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:21:53 +0200
Tobias Klausmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Idea: should it be more obvious in emerge --info and ebuild
> failure that an overlay is involved? If it's obvious enough, I
> don't see a problem. Also, a command that lists all installed
> packages that come from an
Hi!
I'm not a dev (just someone donating 10GB of traffic per day from
his private server to Gentoo), but that's exactly why I think I
need to chime in.
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, foser wrote:
> 1. Stale ebuilds are often stale for a reason, there is
> obviously not enough interest to add and maintain
Hello,
since I've not really been involved in the whole Sunrise discussion I'd
like to give my view in a condensed form, instead of spreading it out
over 20 replies in the ongoing discussion. Also I hope to summarize the
main points a bit, but I know this mail is far from objective and as
such not
13 matches
Mail list logo
