Re: [gentoo-dev] Status of ppc and ppc64 teams.

2014-08-17 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 08/16/14 05:32, Pacho Ramos wrote: El lun, 04-08-2014 a las 18:03 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió: Hi everyone, The ppc and ppc64 team members just had a meeting. One of our main issues was reconstituting those teams because they were in a state of disorganization. We've come up with a p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Status of ppc and ppc64 teams.

2014-08-16 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 04-08-2014 a las 18:03 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió: > Hi everyone, > > The ppc and ppc64 team members just had a meeting. One of our main > issues was reconstituting those teams because they were in a state of > disorganization. We've come up with a plan to move forward and addre

Re: [gentoo-dev] Status of ppc and ppc64 teams.

2014-08-04 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 8/5/14, 12:03 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > The bigger problem is actually KEYWORDREQ's so we are going to > request maintainers not ever drop ~ppc or ~ppc64 even when they feel > a major bump has occurred, eg a deep rewrite to a library. We know > this is living dangerously but we'll going t

[gentoo-dev] Status of ppc and ppc64 teams.

2014-08-04 Thread Anthony G. Basile
Hi everyone, The ppc and ppc64 team members just had a meeting. One of our main issues was reconstituting those teams because they were in a state of disorganization. We've come up with a plan to move forward and address Pacho's original concern about ppc/ppc64 falling behind. Here's what we