Re: [gentoo-dev] Split desktop profile patches & news item for review

2010-03-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 05 March 2010 07:57:32 Ben de Groot wrote: > On 5 March 2010 09:28, Joshua Saddler wrote: > > Feel free to submit some documentation patches now that all our docs are > > #...@ed. Thanks. > > No need for the drama, my friend. A couple of more choices in > profiles does not fuck up all o

Re: [gentoo-dev] Split desktop profile patches & news item for review

2010-03-05 Thread Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 03:46:50PM +0200, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > On Friday 05 March 2010 14:57:32 Ben de Groot wrote: > > On 5 March 2010 09:28, Joshua Saddler wrote: > > > Feel free to submit some documentation patches now that all our docs are > > > #...@ed. Thanks. > > > > No need for the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Split desktop profile patches & news item for review

2010-03-05 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Friday 05 March 2010 14:57:32 Ben de Groot wrote: > On 5 March 2010 09:28, Joshua Saddler wrote: > > Feel free to submit some documentation patches now that all our docs are > > #...@ed. Thanks. > > No need for the drama, my friend. A couple of more choices in > profiles does not fuck up all o

Re: [gentoo-dev] Split desktop profile patches & news item for review

2010-03-05 Thread Ben de Groot
On 5 March 2010 09:28, Joshua Saddler wrote: > Feel free to submit some documentation patches now that all our docs are > #...@ed. > Thanks. No need for the drama, my friend. A couple of more choices in profiles does not fuck up all our docs. Some clarification will need to be added to docs that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Split desktop profile patches & news item for review

2010-03-05 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:52:50 +0200 Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > I'll give three days max for the suggestions here etc, and then I'll proceed > in creating the news item. So I guess it will be committed in a week max. > Thanks Feel free to submit some documentation patches now that all our docs ar

Re: [gentoo-dev] Split desktop profile patches & news item for review

2010-03-04 Thread Ben de Groot
On 4 March 2010 19:15, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 03/04/2010 07:59 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >> On 03/04/10 15:52, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: >>> Hello >>> I have managed to split the desktop profile to gnome and kde submenus. >> >> How about XFCE (and LXDE)? > > Pointless. > > We (xfce) are fin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Split desktop profile patches & news item for review

2010-03-04 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 03/04/2010 07:59 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > On 03/04/10 15:52, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: >> Hello >> I have managed to split the desktop profile to gnome and kde submenus. > > How about XFCE (and LXDE)? Pointless. We (xfce) are fine with plain desktop/ profile (now, and after the gnome and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Split desktop profile patches & news item for review

2010-03-04 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 03/04/10 15:52, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > Hello > I have managed to split the desktop profile to gnome and kde submenus. How about XFCE (and LXDE)? > The > result can be found in kde-crazy overlay (not in layman) [1] If this is ever going to be used as a real overlay please set repo_name t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Split desktop profile patches & news item for review

2010-03-04 Thread Jeremy Olexa
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:52:50 +0200, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > The following issues raised though: > 3) There were no desktop dirs for bsd/prefix etc. That is not an issue for any prefix profiles. It is this way on purpose. Thanks, Jeremy

[gentoo-dev] Split desktop profile patches & news item for review

2010-03-04 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
Hello I have managed to split the desktop profile to gnome and kde submenus. The result can be found in kde-crazy overlay (not in layman) [1] I splitted every desktop/ folder i found. The following issues raised though: 1) I didn't touch the hardened and selinux directories although they do conta