On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 07:54:21PM -0700, Jack Morgan wrote:
> > (b) gnome/kde desktop support
> > I'd like to propose dropping support for gnome/kde desktop if systemd
> > isn't supported on sparc. I'm note sure it makes sense long term nor
> > have developer resources to continue to keyword it. I
On 2016-08-15 22:54, Jack Morgan wrote:
Following up to my email from a year ago
We do have some people in the community who are interested in sparc. In
fact, we have one kernel developer who would like to get multilib
working.
In addition, I have two who are interested in helping by bei
Following up to my email from a year ago
I've been out for several months and getting back to working on Gentoo.
I'd like to provide an update on sparc status...
On 05/17/15 08:36, Jack Morgan wrote:
> All,
>
> I wanted to send out an update on the Sparc arch team status. My overall
> plan i
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Jack Morgan wrote:
> I wanted to send out an update on the Sparc arch team status. My overall
> plan is to reduce the total number of keywords for sparcto a more manageable
> level. I'd like to continue to have sparc be a stable arch for gentoo for as
> long as it
On Sun, 17 May 2015 08:36:00 -0700
Jack Morgan wrote:
> (c) java support
> The java team said they don't have cycles to support sparc. Support
> would have to come from the sparc team or the community. Unless
> someone steps up to help out with java, I'll propose to drop support
> on sparc. Than
All,
I wanted to send out an update on the Sparc arch team status. My overall
plan is to reduce the total number of keywords for sparcto a more
manageable level. I'd like to continue to have sparc be a stable arch
for gentoo for as long as it makes sense. I'm hoping to get some
feedback from
