On Nov 3, 2011 10:25 a.m., "Andreas K. Huettel"
wrote:
>
> On Donnerstag 03 November 2011 09:09:19 Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > Maybe we should keep old changelogs in a separate directory to decrease
> > ebuilddir pollution?
>
> Not sure about that.
Thank you for this infusion of practicality.
Ho
On Donnerstag 03 November 2011 09:09:19 Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Maybe we should keep old changelogs in a separate directory to decrease
> ebuilddir pollution?
Not sure about that.
>
> > The new ChangeLog file will be identical to the current ChangeLog
> > file except for being truncated at 1/1/
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 01:33:38 +0100
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> > 2) I'd like to suggest that for changelogs that grow beyond a
> > certain size (e.g. profiles/ChangeLog) the file is "rotated"
> > similar to /var/log logfiles. I.e. the current file is renamed with
> > a date extens
Dear all,
> 2) I'd like to suggest that for changelogs that grow beyond a certain size
> (e.g. profiles/ChangeLog) the file is "rotated" similar to /var/log
> logfiles. I.e. the current file is renamed with a date extension and a new
> file is started. This has the benefit that the archived file i
