Re: [gentoo-dev] Review for initial systemd.eclass

2011-05-04 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 4 May 2011 15:56:32 +0200 Henry Gebhardt wrote: > On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:54:45PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:17:42 +0200 > > Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > Here's the second version. > > I think the "inherit multilib" line is no longer needed. Thanks, fixe

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review for initial systemd.eclass

2011-05-04 Thread Henry Gebhardt
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:54:45PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:17:42 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > Here's the second version. I think the "inherit multilib" line is no longer needed. > I committed this version to gx86. All packages providing systemd units > are free

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review for initial systemd.eclass

2011-05-04 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:17:42 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Here's the second version. I committed this version to gx86. All packages providing systemd units are free to use it now, yet I'm still open to comments. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review for initial systemd.eclass

2011-04-30 Thread Michał Górny
Here's the second version. Changes: - switched to /lib (like upstream and udev now does), - polished docs and added an example of use, - added systemd_to_myeconfargs() to allow clean argument appending with preservation of whitespace. -- Best regards, Michał Górny systemd.eclass Description:

[gentoo-dev] Review for initial systemd.eclass

2011-04-28 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, I'd like to submit an initial version of systemd.eclass, providing helper functions for packages installing systemd unit files. Such an eclass would be pushed to gx86 before first systemd packages to control the packages installing upstream systemd units. The eclass currently provides four