On 5/26/13 3:35 PM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
On Sun, 26 May 2013 13:59:34 +0200
Luca Barbato wrote:
You need to name a unit with @ suffix, like openvpn@.service:
$ cat /etc/systemd/system/openvpn@.service
[Service]
Type=simple
ExecStart=/usr/sbin/openvpn --user openvpn --gr
On Sun, 26 May 2013 13:59:34 +0200
Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 5/26/13 1:15 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > I'd suspect this is mostly with the growing irritation of systemd
> > haters who spawn endless threads about how they hate anything with
> > 'systemd' name in it. Plus the people who try hard to p
On 5/26/13 1:15 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
I'd suspect this is mostly with the growing irritation of systemd
haters who spawn endless threads about how they hate anything with
'systemd' name in it. Plus the people who try hard to port the mistakes
of OpenRC init scripts to systemd services files.
On 5/26/13 1:31 PM, Robert David wrote:
Come on, it is 2013, wasting few inodes. I did not got these problems
in the old good times with my 386 with 4mb ram and few MB hdd.
Those with embedded system will mask many other files, not only
systemd units (so they save one inode more with my approach,
On Sun, 26 May 2013 12:31:25 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 26 May 2013 12:12:49 +0200
> Robert David wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 26 May 2013 05:49:48 -0400
> > Rich Freeman wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Ben de Groot
> > > wrote:
> > > > On 26 May 2013 15:37, Michał Górny
On Sun, 26 May 2013 12:23:51 +0200
Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 5/26/13 9:37 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > By the way, we should really keep the separation between systemd itself
> > and the unit files. I agree that systemd is not the best thing we could
> > have. But the unit file format is, er, good
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 26 May 2013 12:12:49 +0200
> Robert David wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 26 May 2013 05:49:48 -0400
>> Rich Freeman wrote:
>>
>> > Init.d scripts are just shell scripts. All somebody needs to do is
>> > write a shell script that parses a unit
On Sun, 26 May 2013 12:12:49 +0200
Robert David wrote:
> On Sun, 26 May 2013 05:49:48 -0400
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> > On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Ben de Groot
> > wrote:
> > > On 26 May 2013 15:37, Michał Górny wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Considering the design of OpenRC itself, it wouldn't b
On 5/26/13 9:37 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
By the way, we should really keep the separation between systemd itself
and the unit files. I agree that systemd is not the best thing we could
have. But the unit file format is, er, good enough -- and has
the advantage of eventually taking a lot of work fr
On Sun, 26 May 2013 05:49:48 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Ben de Groot
> wrote:
> > On 26 May 2013 15:37, Michał Górny wrote:
> >>
> >> Considering the design of OpenRC itself, it wouldn't be *that
> >> hard*. Actually, a method similar to one used in oldnet woul
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 26 May 2013 15:37, Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>> Considering the design of OpenRC itself, it wouldn't be *that hard*.
>> Actually, a method similar to one used in oldnet would simply work.
>> That is, symlinking init.d files to a common 'syste
On 26 May 2013 15:37, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 26 May 2013 00:14:36 +0800
> Ben de Groot wrote:
>
>> Systemd is diametrically opposed to the FreeBSD, customization,
>> extreme configurability, and top-notch developer community aspects of
>> that. Systemd upstream developers have made it abun
On Sun, 26 May 2013 00:14:36 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> Systemd is diametrically opposed to the FreeBSD, customization,
> extreme configurability, and top-notch developer community aspects of
> that. Systemd upstream developers have made it abundantly clear they
> are not interested in working w
13 matches
Mail list logo
