Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits

2010-04-27 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 24/04/2010 19:40, Petteri Räty a écrit : > What do you think about not allowing commits to eclasses without > mentioning an another developer who has reviewed and approved the diff > in the commit message? There's enough people on gentoo-dev for urgent > stuff too. More bureaucracy and policies

Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits

2010-04-26 Thread Steev Klimaszewski
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Alistair Bush wrote: Use common sense here. ^^ Seems pretty clear to me.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits

2010-04-25 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25-04-2010 13:10, Petteri Räty wrote: > On 04/26/2010 01:42 AM, Alistair Bush wrote: >>> On 04/24/2010 09:14 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:40:54 +0300 Petteri Räty wrote: > 17:34 < Betelgeuse> robbat2|na: how e

Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits

2010-04-25 Thread Petteri Räty
On 04/26/2010 01:42 AM, Alistair Bush wrote: >> On 04/24/2010 09:14 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: >>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:40:54 +0300 >>> >>> Petteri Räty wrote: 17:34 < Betelgeuse> robbat2|na: how easy to it to prevent commits to CVS if the commit message doesn't match a certain pattern?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits

2010-04-25 Thread Roy Bamford
On 2010.04.24 18:40, Petteri Räty wrote: > 17:34 < Betelgeuse> robbat2|na: how easy to it to prevent commits to > CVS > if the commit message doesn't match a certain pattern? > 17:36 <@robbat2|na> go and checkout the CVSROOT and there should be > an > example there > 17:37 < Betelgeuse> robbat2|na

Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits

2010-04-25 Thread Alistair Bush
> On 04/24/2010 09:14 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:40:54 +0300 > > > > Petteri Räty wrote: > >> 17:34 < Betelgeuse> robbat2|na: how easy to it to prevent commits to > >> CVS if the commit message doesn't match a certain pattern? > >> 17:36 <@robbat2|na> go and checkout the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits

2010-04-25 Thread Petteri Räty
On 04/24/2010 09:14 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:40:54 +0300 > Petteri Räty wrote: > >> 17:34 < Betelgeuse> robbat2|na: how easy to it to prevent commits to >> CVS if the commit message doesn't match a certain pattern? >> 17:36 <@robbat2|na> go and checkout the CVSROOT and t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits

2010-04-24 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:40:54 +0300 Petteri Räty wrote: > 17:34 < Betelgeuse> robbat2|na: how easy to it to prevent commits to > CVS if the commit message doesn't match a certain pattern? > 17:36 <@robbat2|na> go and checkout the CVSROOT and there should be an > example there > 17:37 < Betelgeuse>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits

2010-04-24 Thread Arun Raghavan
On 24 April 2010 23:10, Petteri Räty wrote: > 17:34 < Betelgeuse> robbat2|na: how easy to it to prevent commits to CVS > if the commit message doesn't match a certain pattern? > 17:36 <@robbat2|na> go and checkout the CVSROOT and there should be an > example there > 17:37 < Betelgeuse> robbat2|na:

[gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits

2010-04-24 Thread Petteri Räty
17:34 < Betelgeuse> robbat2|na: how easy to it to prevent commits to CVS if the commit message doesn't match a certain pattern? 17:36 <@robbat2|na> go and checkout the CVSROOT and there should be an example there 17:37 < Betelgeuse> robbat2|na: Ok so doable then. Thanks. What do you think about no