On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 16:48 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:41:23 +0200
> Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> > So here the reverting of a masking in gentoo-x86 is quite intentional
> > and currently desired.
>
> This is fundamentally broken as a concept.
>
> Adding an overlay should n
2009/3/5 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) :
>
> The problem of ebuilds in one overlay not seeing ebuilds in another overlay,
> would also be solved by the package manager NOT failing to
> see/notice/use/allow
> ebuilds from all installed overlays. Then there would be no need for a
> hierarchy
> among over
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> The problem of ebuilds in one overlay not seeing ebuilds in another overlay,
> would also be solved by the package manager NOT failing to
> see/notice/use/allow
> ebuilds from all installed overlays. Then there would b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The problem of ebuilds in one overlay not seeing ebuilds in another overlay,
would also be solved by the package manager NOT failing to see/notice/use/allow
ebuilds from all installed overlays. Then there would be no need for a hierarchy
among overlays
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zac Medico wrote:
> Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>> This seems desirable and reasonable.
>> As I replied to this subject earlier regarding KDE, let me complement
>> that information. In the case of the KDE team, we keep work on a release
>> all in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> This seems desirable and reasonable.
> As I replied to this subject earlier regarding KDE, let me complement
> that information. In the case of the KDE team, we keep work on a release
> all in the same place, so we d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:41:23 +0200
> Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>> So here the reverting of a masking in gentoo-x86 is quite intentional
>> and currently desired.
>
> This is fundamentally broken as a concept.
>
> Adding an overla
Le lundi 02 mars 2009 à 23:59 +, Ciaran McCreesh a écrit :
> On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:55:38 +0100
> Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> > We didn't implement anything but let's just talk about what we wanted
> > to see. We simply wanted overlay users to keep testing gnome 2.24
> > components that wer
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:55:38 +0100
Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> We didn't implement anything but let's just talk about what we wanted
> to see. We simply wanted overlay users to keep testing gnome 2.24
> components that were masked or using masked packages in
> base/package.mask so we just made
Le lundi 02 mars 2009 à 16:48 +, Ciaran McCreesh a écrit :
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:41:23 +0200
> Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> > So here the reverting of a masking in gentoo-x86 is quite
> intentional and currently desired.
>
> This is fundamentally broken as a concept.
>
> Adding an overlay shoul
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:41:23 +0200
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> So here the reverting of a masking in gentoo-x86 is quite intentional
> and currently desired.
This is fundamentally broken as a concept.
Adding an overlay should not have any impact upon other repositories.
It should be possible for a us
A. On K, 2009-02-25 at 04:56 -0800, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 01:42:38PM +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> > Le mardi 24 février 2009 à 09:47 -0800, Brian Harring a écrit :
> > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:26:48PM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > > This is your fri
12 matches
Mail list logo
