Re: [gentoo-dev] Realistic AT goals [WAS] Re: Bugzilla isn't just for bugs [reminder]

Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:32:29AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > >>Duncan wrote: >>| The AT guidelines (available for amd64 ATs here: >>| http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/tests/index.xml ) specifically >>| mention testing "every conceivable permutation", >>That'

Re: [gentoo-dev] Realistic AT goals [WAS] Re: Bugzilla isn't just for bugs [reminder]

On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:32:29AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Duncan wrote: > | The AT guidelines (available for amd64 ATs here: > | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/tests/index.xml ) specifically > | mention testing "every conceivable permutation", > That's an absolute joke for reason

Re: [gentoo-dev] Realistic AT goals [WAS] Re: Bugzilla isn't just for bugs [reminder]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Duncan wrote: | The AT guidelines (available for amd64 ATs here: | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/tests/index.xml ) specifically | mention testing "every conceivable permutation", That's an absolute joke for reasonably large packages with s