Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: tmpfiles virtual

2016-11-17 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Martin Vaeth wrote: > > For instance, the systemd-tmpfiles implementation has some > features concerning btrfs which are not (yet) supported by > opentmpfiles. Some users might want to use that features. > Well, this was the main reason I suggested that we could j

[gentoo-dev] Re: tmpfiles virtual

2016-11-17 Thread Martin Vaeth
Rich Freeman wrote: > > If systemd-tmpfiles can work when systemd isn't running According to a brief test (not very exhaustive), this seems to work, though I did not investigate whether it requires that e.g. dbus is running. Without entering the discussion _how_ an init-script should be installe

[gentoo-dev] Re: tmpfiles virtual

2016-11-17 Thread Martin Vaeth
Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >> >> Realistically, software should ensure the directories it needs at >> runtime are created through their own code, but upstreams are lazy [...] > > This isn't really being lazy. This is just not re-inventing the >