On 14/10/16 10:22 AM, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On 10/13/2016 10:21 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> On 13/10/16 10:13 AM, Raymond Jennings wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Fernando Rodriguez
>>> mailto:cyklon...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/04/2016 06:24 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On 10/13/2016 10:21 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 13/10/16 10:13 AM, Raymond Jennings wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Fernando Rodriguez
>> mailto:cyklon...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/04/2016 06:24 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> >
>> > This would actually be another reas
On 13/10/16 10:13 AM, Raymond Jennings wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Fernando Rodriguez
> mailto:cyklon...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On 10/04/2016 06:24 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > This would actually be another reason to get rid of grub-0, if it can't
> > build on
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Fernando Rodriguez
wrote:
> On 10/04/2016 06:24 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > This would actually be another reason to get rid of grub-0, if it can't
> > build on one of our profiles, it will more than likely never be fixed
> > upstream because they are now
On 10/04/2016 06:24 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> This would actually be another reason to get rid of grub-0, if it can't
> build on one of our profiles, it will more than likely never be fixed
> upstream because they are now focused on grub-2.x.
grub-0 is 32-bit software. You could build it w
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 08:44:05PM +, Duncan wrote:
> William Hubbs posted on Mon, 03 Oct 2016 16:59:33 -0500 as excerpted:
>
> > I want to look into removing grub:0 from the tree; here are my thoughts
> > on why it should go.
>
> I don't disagree with the thought, but have some niggles on th
William Hubbs posted on Mon, 03 Oct 2016 16:59:33 -0500 as excerpted:
> I want to look into removing grub:0 from the tree; here are my thoughts
> on why it should go.
I don't disagree with the thought, but have some niggles on the
individual points. Note that I'm not nearly as negative on the i
On 10/04/2016 12:45 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> -1
>
> I'd love to move to grub2 for all of my machines, but it does simply not
> work for one of my servers. I can install grub2 and it tells me that
> installation and anything else went fine, but when I try to boot with it, it
> stops and report
On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 09:45:35 +0200
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> So, what are my options (or other people's options with such
> incompatible hardware) without grub 1? Lilo?
How about syslinux?
--
James Le Cuirot (chewi)
Gentoo Linux Developer
On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 09:45:35 +0200
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> -1
>
> I'd love to move to grub2 for all of my machines, but it does simply not
> work for one of my servers. I can install grub2 and it tells me that
> installation and anything else went fine, but when I try to boot with it, it
> sto
-1
I'd love to move to grub2 for all of my machines, but it does simply not
work for one of my servers. I can install grub2 and it tells me that
installation and anything else went fine, but when I try to boot with it, it
stops and reports me that it found some conflicting area in my bios why i
11 matches
Mail list logo
