Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net

2012-02-07 Thread Alexandre Rostovtsev
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 11:33 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 04:46:58PM +, Duncan wrote: > > 1) Separate net.lo service for stuff that doesn't have to have an > > external connection at all. > > This can be easily done. I'll just make net.lo* not provide net. > > > 2)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net

2012-02-07 Thread William Hubbs
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 04:46:58PM +, Duncan wrote: > 1) Separate net.lo service for stuff that doesn't have to have an > external connection at all. This can be easily done. I'll just make net.lo* not provide net. > 2) A default net (or net*) service that is is composed of all non-net.lo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net

2012-02-07 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/02/12 11:46 AM, Duncan wrote: > Ian Stakenvicius posted on Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:39:14 -0500 as > excerpted: > >> I think that "Category 2" needs to be separated into "2a - any >> network", and "2b - any public network". For instance, the >> se

[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net

2012-02-07 Thread Duncan
Ian Stakenvicius posted on Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:39:14 -0500 as excerpted: > I think that "Category 2" needs to be separated into "2a - any network", > and "2b - any public network". For instance, the service 'net' (for 2a) > and service 'inet' (for 2b). If this were the default case, then Cat.2 >

[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net

2012-02-06 Thread Duncan
Alexandre Rostovtsev posted on Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:33:39 -0500 as excerpted: > On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 19:41 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: >> > My counterproposal is to (a) fix init scripts for Category 2 so that >> > instead of "use net" or "need net", they only "use net.lo" or "need >> > net.lo"; an