On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 02:50:56PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 03:30:41PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On 07/08/15 03:18 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 01:39:25PM -0400, Ian Stakenvi
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 03:30:41PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 07/08/15 03:18 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 01:39:25PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
> >>
> >>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/08/15 03:18 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 01:39:25PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 07/08/15 12:59 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 12:10:56PM
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 01:39:25PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 07/08/15 12:59 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 12:10:56PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
> >>
> >>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/08/15 12:59 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 12:10:56PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 07/08/15 11:30 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 08:07:44PM
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 12:10:56PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 07/08/15 11:30 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 08:07:44PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >>
> >> Can we get "nofail" immediately in the mount -a vari
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/08/15 11:30 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 08:07:44PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>
>> Can we get "nofail" immediately in the mount -a variants of
>> localmount/netmount and expand that in netmount to make the
>> nfscli
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 08:07:44PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
> Can we get "nofail" immediately in the mount -a variants of
> localmount/netmount and expand that in netmount to make the nfsclient dep be
> a "use" or a "need" depending on if it's set or not?? That would imo kill
> the exi
> On Aug 6, 2015, at 6:22 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> William Hubbs posted on Thu, 06 Aug 2015 16:36:49 -0500 as excerpted:
>
>> Also, I want to talk more about netmount and localmount failing.
>>
>> If netmount and localmount are set up to fail if one of the file systems
>> t
William Hubbs posted on Thu, 06 Aug 2015 16:36:49 -0500 as excerpted:
> Also, I want to talk more about netmount and localmount failing.
>
> If netmount and localmount are set up to fail if one of the file systems
> they mount fails (which is what other init systems out there do), the
> sys admin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/08/15 02:58 AM, Duncan wrote:
> William Hubbs posted on Wed, 05 Aug 2015 10:26:33 -0500 as
> excerpted:
>
>> It isn't localmount that would have the issue, but mount.*
>> because they are lexically after localmount, so you would end up
>> with
William Hubbs posted on Wed, 05 Aug 2015 10:26:33 -0500 as excerpted:
> It isn't localmount that would have the issue, but mount.* because they
> are lexically after localmount, so you would end up with localmount
> doing a mount -a then mount.* coming later trying to mount file systems
> again th
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 10:18:13AM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 05/08/15 10:01 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 04:50:40AM +, Duncan wrote:
> >> Ian Stakenvicius posted on Tue, 04 Aug 2015 17:17:51 -0400 as
> >> e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/08/15 10:01 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 04:50:40AM +, Duncan wrote:
>> Ian Stakenvicius posted on Tue, 04 Aug 2015 17:17:51 -0400 as
>> excerpted:
>>
>>> So what you are suggesting here now is that you want to (A)
>>
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 04:50:40AM +, Duncan wrote:
> Ian Stakenvicius posted on Tue, 04 Aug 2015 17:17:51 -0400 as excerpted:
>
> > So what you are suggesting here now is that you want to (A) potentially
> > break mounting with the need to externally manage mounts via services in
> > openrc i
Ian Stakenvicius posted on Tue, 04 Aug 2015 17:17:51 -0400 as excerpted:
> So what you are suggesting here now is that you want to (A) potentially
> break mounting with the need to externally manage mounts via services in
> openrc instead of just using /etc/fstab, and (B) also break services if
>
Daniel Campbell (zlg) posted on Wed, 29 Jul 2015 01:54:03 -0700 as
excerpted:
> On 07/28/2015 06:57 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>
>> I don't quite understand your question, but I'll give it a shot.
>>
>> With the new mount service, it will not matter whether the file systems
>> are local or on the
17 matches
Mail list logo
