Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x

2011-07-02 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > One thing to keep in mind when we're talking about the download of > historical binaries is the obligations of the GPL, etc, in that regard. >... > But once you start shipping historical binaries, as we're talking here, Actuall

[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x

2011-07-01 Thread Duncan
Rich Freeman posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:50:28 -0400 as excerpted: > I wonder if there is a way to get around keeping cruft in the tree for > the sake of those who don't update often. > > Something that comes to mind is having a binpkg repository for > everything in system - essentially a binpk

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x

2011-07-01 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > You're very correct about portage getting confused if the existing > packages are outdated, since the tarball would be dropping in untracked > files.  At least in the past, portage wouldn't unmerge glibc or the like, > but it ce

[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x

2011-07-01 Thread Duncan
Duncan posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:26:58 + as excerpted: > Patrick Lauer posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:45:16 +0200 as excerpted: > >> [Keeping an up and running system during a reinstall is] not as easy >> as it could be. > Can't disagree there. =:^) ... And upon further thought, can't di

[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x

2011-07-01 Thread Duncan
Patrick Lauer posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:45:16 +0200 as excerpted: >> So keeping an up and running machine even with a reinstall isn't a >> problem, certainly no more of one than fighting with broken installs, >> because everything has changed out from under the existing one. > > It's not as e

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x

2011-07-01 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 07/01/11 11:25, Duncan wrote: > Nirbheek Chauhan posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:26:50 +0530 as excerpted: > >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Dale wrote: >>> William Hubbs wrote: >>> As a user, if a person hasn't upgraded in about 6 months, they may as >>> well reinstall anyway. That is usua

[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x

2011-07-01 Thread Duncan
Nirbheek Chauhan posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:26:50 +0530 as excerpted: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Dale wrote: >> William Hubbs wrote: >> As a user, if a person hasn't upgraded in about 6 months, they may as >> well reinstall anyway.  That is usually the advice given on -user. >>  After