Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: proposal for consistency between {RUBY,PYTHON,PHP}_TARGETS

2012-11-26 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 26/11/2012 00:20, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > The request is for Gentoo administration. So, talking about developers > of a language is not the question. "Gentoo administration"? What on earth would that be? > I am a ruby developer and having ruby18 or ruby_1_8 is not much a > problem. There ar

[gentoo-dev] Re: proposal for consistency between {RUBY,PYTHON,PHP}_TARGETS

2012-11-26 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
The 24/11/12, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > No. Being consistently stupid is not a good reason to be consistent. Stop being fallacious, please. > And since as I said the RUBY_TARGETS interface is designed to be _usable > by Ruby developers_, being consistent and breaking that, is not > something I

[gentoo-dev] Re: proposal for consistency between {RUBY,PYTHON,PHP}_TARGETS

2012-11-24 Thread Duncan
Peter Stuge posted on Sat, 24 Nov 2012 20:20:27 +0100 as excerpted: > Jauhien Piatlicki wrote: >>> PHP_TARGETS="5.3 5.4" >>> RUBY_TARGETS="1.9" >>> PYTHON_TARGETS="2.7" >>> >>> But maybe it would be too problematic? >> >> What will you do with PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_2 pypy1_9 >> jytho