"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:31:50 -0800:
> My usability design range in testing this spans: 1024x768 to 1680x1050,
> at both 72dpi and 100dpi. However it seems that I didn't take into
> account fonts that render extremel
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:57:04PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > Having small fonts isn't common, at least not amongst folk that I've
> > directly observed in usability testing. Having text at sizes that don't
> > strain the eyes is more common.
> It doesn't seem unreasonabl
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Having small fonts isn't common, at least not amongst folk that I've
> directly observed in usability testing. Having text at sizes that don't
> strain the eyes is more common.
It doesn't seem unreasonable that the site be readable despite the font
size. The logo overlap
Joe Peterson schrieb:
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> One idea for improvement, however, might be to spell the archs
> veritcally, thereby easily letting all archs be viewable across one page
> (even perhaps by default). It would help to boast our many arch support.
Heh, well I think the devs are use
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 10:12:46PM -0800, Josh Saddler wrote:
>> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>>> There isn't meant to be the big black area at the top like, the main
>>> gentoo.org site.
>> But shouldn't there be some sort of area at the top with links to the
>> other parts of
> But shouldn't there be some sort of area at the top with links to the
> other parts of the site, as the other pages do (the navstrip across the
> top)? Right now there's zero integration with the gentoo.org site, and
> even the old p.g.o had at least minimal integration with the other parts
> of
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 10:12:46PM -0800, Josh Saddler wrote:
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > There isn't meant to be the big black area at the top like, the main
> > gentoo.org site.
> But shouldn't there be some sort of area at the top with links to the
> other parts of the site, as the other pages
Good point! Thanks.
Short packages2 TODO list
This is not the comprehensive version of the TODO list.
That may be found in the /todo/ directory of the source code.
* "Search": match a given string against: a substring in
packages names, and description
On Nov 14, 2007 11:22 AM, D
On 11:13 Wed 14 Nov , Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the great work!
>
> I'm just wondering how to search for a specific package. Is that possible?
Please read the entire FAQ [1] before asking any questions, as Robin
said in his original post.
Thanks,
Donnie
1. http://packages
Thanks a lot for the great work!
I'm just wondering how to search for a specific package. Is that possible?
On Nov 14, 2007 10:55 AM, Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 14. November 2007, Josh Saddler wrote:
> > Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > > There isn't meant to be the big b
On Mittwoch, 14. November 2007, Josh Saddler wrote:
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > There isn't meant to be the big black area at the top like, the main
> > gentoo.org site.
>
> But shouldn't there be some sort of area at the top with links to the
> other parts of the site, as the other pages do (the
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> There isn't meant to be the big black area at the top like, the main
> gentoo.org site.
But shouldn't there be some sort of area at the top with links to the
other parts of the site, as the other pages do (the navstrip across the
top)? Right now there's zero integration w
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:14:57 -0600:
>> Please read the entire FAQ before asking any questions!
>> http://packages.gentoo.org/faq/
>
> Does this count as a rendering bug? Seems to be missing the
> black/purple banner bit.
>
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 10:14:57PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > Please read the entire FAQ before asking any questions!
> > http://packages.gentoo.org/faq/
> Does this count as a rendering bug? Seems to be missing the
> black/purple banner bit.
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dirtyepic/misc/pgologo.png
No
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> After a LOT of development, Gentoo Infra is pleased to announce the
> return of the new packages.gentoo.org site. The new site is a complete
> rewrite.
Yay! Nice work guys.
> Please read the entire FAQ before asking any questions!
> http://packages.gentoo.org/faq/
Does
15 matches
Mail list logo
