[gentoo-dev] Re: new-style virtual/editor

2007-10-10 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > about 26 ebuilds have a PROVIDE=virtual/editor. Those could be > transformed to a new-style virtual, which is really simple. According > to zmedico and genone the impact of just commiting the virtual would > be low. But I'd like to hear some comments o

[gentoo-dev] Re: new-style virtual/editor

2007-10-06 Thread Duncan
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:22:08 -0700: > On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 14:57 -0400, Olivier CrĂȘte wrote: >> On Fri, 2007-05-10 at 11:46 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: >> > How many packages depend on virtual/editor? Should it be