Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.lua.general/18519
>
> That reply is from 2005 and is apparently specific to (32-bit) x86's
Even more is true! The only argument there concerns pic.
But most distributions (hopefully also gentoo in a not-so-distant
Hi,
On Sun, 2 Jul 2017 10:30:12 -0500 William Hubbs wrote:
> > All that said, in FLOSS, he who volunteers, makes the rules, and
> > particularly given the upstream opposition meaning more gentoo-level work
> > required, if there's nobody willing to support lua in gentoo with dynamic
> > linking
William Hubbs posted on Sun, 02 Jul 2017 10:30:12 -0500 as excerpted:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 03:55:54AM +, Duncan wrote:
>> William Hubbs posted on Sat, 01 Jul 2017 11:53:59 -0500 as excerpted:
>>
>> > See this article for why using liblua as a shared library is not
>> > recommended.
>> >
On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 03:55:54AM +, Duncan wrote:
> William Hubbs posted on Sat, 01 Jul 2017 11:53:59 -0500 as excerpted:
>
> > See this article for why using liblua as a shared library is not
> > recommended.
> >
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.lua.general/18519
> >
> > Yes,
William Hubbs posted on Sat, 01 Jul 2017 11:53:59 -0500 as excerpted:
> See this article for why using liblua as a shared library is not
> recommended.
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.lua.general/18519
>
> Yes, it talks about the interpretor, but it goes further and really
> discour
