On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 13:22:43 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> On 08/09/2015 12:16 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 05:36:16 +
> > "Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 05:47:14PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:39:52PM +, Robin H. Jo
On 08/09/2015 01:55 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> On 2015-08-09 13:22, hasufell wrote:
>> On 08/09/2015 12:16 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
>>> On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 05:36:16 +
>>> "Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
>>>
On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 05:47:14PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 20
On 2015-08-09 13:22, hasufell wrote:
> On 08/09/2015 12:16 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 05:36:16 +
> > "Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 05:47:14PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:39:52PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>
On 08/09/2015 12:16 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 05:36:16 +
> "Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 05:47:14PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:39:52PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
2015/08/08 15:00 UTC - Freeze
2015/08/08
On 09 Aug 2015 04:16, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 05:36:16 + "Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 05:47:14PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:39:52PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > > > 2015/08/08 15:00 UTC - Freeze
> > > > 2015/08/08
On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 05:36:16 +
"Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 05:47:14PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:39:52PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > > 2015/08/08 15:00 UTC - Freeze
> > > 2015/08/08 19:00 UTC - Git commits open for developers
>
Rich Freeman:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 12:48 PM, hasufell wrote:
>> Steven J. Long:
>>
>>> Either way, I don't think the discussion about Changelogs should *at all*
>>> affect the move to git;
>>
>> Correct, because this wouldn't even be a regression to the current CVS
>> workflow.
>>
>
> That
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 12:48 PM, hasufell wrote:
> Steven J. Long:
>
>> Either way, I don't think the discussion about Changelogs should *at all*
>> affect the move to git;
>
> Correct, because this wouldn't even be a regression to the current CVS
> workflow.
>
That depends a great deal on how
Steven J. Long:
>
> VCS commit messages are very different to the ebuild Changelogs ime.
Yes, but this does not even apply to the current gentoo CVS workflow
(compare the cvs commit messages with the ChangeLog entries, e.g. for
sys-apps/portage).
> I would ask that you consider the different pur
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 07:26:06AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:18 AM, hasufell wrote:
> > Ulrich Mueller:
> >>
> >> ChangeLogs are aimed at users
> >
> > Did any1 ask them if they care?
> >
>
> I'm sure somebody will reply and say that they care.
Yup, mainly because of
Hi,
Richard Freeman :
> Having branches to do development and facilitate access and testing
> seems fine, however we should always have the goal of getting these
> tested revisions merged back into the main tree. We really don't
> want divergent development to be the norm.
Right, the extensiv
11 matches
Mail list logo
