> "TC" == Tomáš Chvátal writes:
TC> No need to escape it if it is in "". it is parsed as the char itself
TC> like this.
The escaping is for grep(1), not for sh(1).
-JimC
--
James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 17.4.2011 20:31, James Cloos napsal(a):
> That looks good (by inspection).
>
> My only concern is the branch deletion in the non-bare update.
>
> First of all, * should be escaped. It seems to work OK with gnu grep,
> but it would be better to b
That looks good (by inspection).
My only concern is the branch deletion in the non-bare update.
First of all, * should be escaped. It seems to work OK with gnu grep,
but it would be better to be explicit. (grep(1) says that only ?+{|()
loose their meta-meaning in basic regexps.)
Second, why de
On Tuesday 22 of March 2011 22:07:25 you wrote:
> Hi guys,
> as there are no more complaints in kde overlay i would like you to test
> your git using live ebuild with this new git-2 eclass and tell me how
> you like it.
>
> Also usual review of what already is in is welcomed because i would
> real
On 10:44 Wed 23 Mar , James Cloos wrote:
> TC> So live with it.
>
> I cannot. It makes the eclass useless.
>
> I have almost 2 gigs of bare repo in distdirs/git-src.
>
> A forced re-download of all of that is just not possible!
>
> The existing distdir clones *MUST* continue to work.
>
> "DB" == Donnie Berkholz writes:
JC> Or better yet, git clone.
DB> This could work well with --shared; even worked for me on separate
DB> partitions.
Yes, I did mean »git clone -l -s«.
-JimC
--
James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
On 08:28 Wed 23 Mar , James Cloos wrote:
> > "MF" == Mike Frysinger writes:
>
> MF> ideally, the git eclass should be creating bare checkouts only in its
> MF> store dir, in which case it could use `git archive | tar` to move
> MF> things over ...
>
> Or better yet, git clone.
This coul
> "TC" == Tomáš Chvátal writes:
TC> I explained multiple times already why bare checkouts are not
TC> working in our case.
Wait a minute.
Not using bare clones in DISTDIR is completely unacceptable here.
It is bad enough to have to use non-bare for repos which have
submodules. Doing so fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 23.3.2011 13:28, James Cloos napsal(a):
>> "MF" == Mike Frysinger writes:
>
> MF> ideally, the git eclass should be creating bare checkouts only in its
> MF> store dir, in which case it could use `git archive | tar` to move
> MF> things over
> "MF" == Mike Frysinger writes:
MF> ideally, the git eclass should be creating bare checkouts only in its
MF> store dir, in which case it could use `git archive | tar` to move
MF> things over ...
Or better yet, git clone.
Most builds from vcs work best when they know that they are building
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:08:53 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > rsync -rlpgo . "${EGIT_SOURCEDIR}" \
>>
>> this means you need to have DEPEND="net-misc/rsync". why not just use
>> `cp -pPR` instead ? i vaguely recall rsync being slower than a
>> s
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:41:27 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:08:53 -0400
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
>
> > > rsync -rlpgo . "${EGIT_SOURCEDIR}" \
> >
> > this means you need to have DEPEND="net-misc/rsync". why not just use
> > `cp -pPR` instead ? i vaguely recall rsync being
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:08:53 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > rsync -rlpgo . "${EGIT_SOURCEDIR}" \
>
> this means you need to have DEPEND="net-misc/rsync". why not just use
> `cp -pPR` instead ? i vaguely recall rsync being slower than a
> straight cp too ... not much point of doing a rsync wh
13 matches
Mail list logo
