[gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2012-11-12 Thread Michael Palimaka
Hi, On 2012-11-11 18:44, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote: --- package.mask11 Nov 2012 02:03:39 - 1.14217 +++ package.mask11 Nov 2012 07:44:58 - 1.14218 -# Michael Weber (9 Jun 2012) -# The mentioned versions fail to assemble raid 0/1/5 devices. -# As reported in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2012-07-12 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon wrote: > On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 21:09 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >> Maybe Tony mismerged your changes into his? > > Thank you for your trust in me. > cvs commit -m completed non-interactively, without notification of > conflict or request to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2012-07-12 Thread Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 21:09 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > Maybe Tony mismerged your changes into his? Thank you for your trust in me. cvs commit -m completed non-interactively, without notification of conflict or request to merge. Regards, Tony V. signature.asc Description: This is a digitall

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2012-07-12 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > Shouldn't CVS have prevented my changes to profile.mask from being > overwritten by the next committer? Maybe Tony mismerged your changes into his? On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 12-07-2012 14:50:18 -040

[gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2012-07-12 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 12-07-2012 14:50:18 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > Shouldn't CVS have prevented my changes to profile.mask from being > overwritten by the next committer? How could CVS have done that (or git, hg, whatever VCS)? -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level signature.asc Description:

[gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2012-07-12 Thread Alexandre Rostovtsev
Shouldn't CVS have prevented my changes to profile.mask from being overwritten by the next committer? > chainsaw12/07/11 12:24:43 > > Modified: ChangeLog package.mask > Log: > Mask =net-misc/asterisk-10.6.0 for null pointer dereferencing. > > Revision ChangesPath > 1.6