Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: default desktop profile

2007-08-02 Thread Jean-Marc Hengen
Martin Schwier wrote: > In the libnotify > case I would vote to make it a static dependency and not useflag > controllable or at least set the useflag by default. I see this so: If upstream thinks, this is an option, the ebuild should reflect this. If upstream thinks, this is vital, the ebuild sho

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: default desktop profile

2007-08-02 Thread Steev Klimaszewski
Martin Schwier wrote: The gnome meta ebuild pulls in way too much stuff. I always have to copy it in my local overlay and have to remove epiphany, evolution, vino, ekiga and more. There are no use flags to control this and I expect many gnome users to use Firefox and Thunderbird instead of epip

[gentoo-dev] Re: default desktop profile

2007-08-02 Thread Martin Schwier
RĂ©mi Cardona wrote: > One of the core Gentoo philosophies is that it's a meta distribution. As > such, the idea of "opt in" rather than "opt out" has been the motto for > quite a while. It's one defining trait of Gentoo. I second that. But gentoo isn't following this philosophies strictly. The pro

[gentoo-dev] Re: default desktop profile

2007-08-02 Thread Steve Long
Martin Schwier wrote: > +bash-completion Well I for one can't stand bash-completion, but I guess I could always disable it if others think it useful. > +bluetooth > +ffmpeg(totem isn't much without it) If it's just for a specific package, there is a default package.use iirc. > +libnotify (giv