On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:31:08AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Alexander Berntsen
> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > On 16/12/15 13:39, Rich Freeman wrote:
> >> I don't see how this is dishonest.
> > You answered this yoursel
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 16/12/15 13:39, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> I don't see how this is dishonest.
> You answered this yourself,
>
>> They'll just be credited side-by-side with everybody else in once
>> pl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 16/12/15 13:39, Rich Freeman wrote:
> I don't see how this is dishonest.
You answered this yourself,
> They'll just be credited side-by-side with everybody else in once
> place.
- --
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~ale
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
>
> I agree with Mike that this isn't kosher. It just isn't honest.
>
I don't really have a horse in this race, but I don't see how this is
dishonest. What is being proposed is moving from attribution
scattered all over the place to attr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I agree with Mike that this isn't kosher. It just isn't honest.
On 15/12/15 20:37, William Hubbs wrote:
> Multiple entries are what I want to get away from; it is a
> nightmare to maintain, and the vcs shows far better than you or I
> ever could whi
On 15 Dec 2015 13:37, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 02:24:22PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > your description sounds like you want to run:
> > s/Copyright .*/Copyright OpenRC Authors/
> >
> > i'm saying you can't do that
>
> That's the first part, the second part is to hav
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 02:24:22PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 15 Dec 2015 09:31, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:05:07AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On 11 Dec 2015 14:16, Patrick McLean wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:37:48 -0600 William Hubbs wrote:
> > > >
On 15 Dec 2015 09:31, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:05:07AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 11 Dec 2015 14:16, Patrick McLean wrote:
> > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:37:48 -0600 William Hubbs wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 09:04:47PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:05:07AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 11 Dec 2015 14:16, Patrick McLean wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:37:48 -0600 William Hubbs wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 09:04:47PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, William Hubbs wrote:
>
On 11 Dec 2015 14:16, Patrick McLean wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:37:48 -0600 William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 09:04:47PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, William Hubbs wrote:
> > >
> > Well, the OpenRC project is currently inconsistent about thi
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 02:16:30PM -0800, Patrick McLean wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:37:48 -0600
> William Hubbs wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 09:04:47PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, William Hubbs wrote:
> > >
> > Well, the OpenRC project is curren
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:37:48 -0600
William Hubbs wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 09:04:47PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> Well, the OpenRC project is currently inconsistent about this, so the
> intention is to make it consistent.
>
>
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 09:04:47PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> > currently, OpenRC has file-based copyright/licensing information.
> > I would like to centralize all of this information, following the
> > centralized model described here [1].
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, William Hubbs wrote:
> currently, OpenRC has file-based copyright/licensing information.
> I would like to centralize all of this information, following the
> centralized model described here [1].
> This would mean that, at the top of each file, there would be a
> copyr
14 matches
Mail list logo
