[gentoo-dev] Re: changes to tested bugzilla keyword proposal

2013-02-03 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 01:41:00 -0600 Ryan Hill wrote: > On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 06:15:32 -0500 > Rich Freeman wrote: > > Are there any issues with changing the product/component on existing > > bugs? I could see things turn into keyword requests which didn't > > start out as such. > > The message I q

[gentoo-dev] Re: changes to tested bugzilla keyword proposal

2013-02-02 Thread Ryan Hill
On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 06:15:32 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: > >> > >> If we added a "Keyword/Stable Request" component to the "Gentoo Linux" > >> product we could also have it dependent on that, so only bugs in that > >> component would display the f

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: changes to tested bugzilla keyword proposal

2013-02-01 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: >> >> If we added a "Keyword/Stable Request" component to the "Gentoo Linux" >> product we could also have it dependent on that, so only bugs in that >> component would display the flags. You'd need to include security bugs as well at the very lea

[gentoo-dev] Re: changes to tested bugzilla keyword proposal

2013-01-31 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 18:02:01 +0100 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > A lot clearer than a single text field littered with keywords would be some > tick boxes, indeed. In fact, it makes me wonder why we use a half-obscured > list in a select field for adding/removing arch teams now. https://bugs.gentoo.org