Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bug wrangler queue is large...

2010-07-19 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 19-07-2010 a las 21:05 +0300, Alex Alexander escribió: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 08:01:38PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:50:00 +0300 > > Markos Chandras wrote: > > > > > The queue is almost 100 bugs long again. We could really use some > > > help here. Thanks >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bug wrangler queue is large...

2010-07-19 Thread Alex Alexander
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 08:01:38PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:50:00 +0300 > Markos Chandras wrote: > > > The queue is almost 100 bugs long again. We could really use some > > help here. Thanks > > Down to 7 now. wow. nice work! -- Alex Alexander :: wired Gentoo Deve

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bug wrangler queue is large...

2010-07-19 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:50:00 +0300 Markos Chandras wrote: > The queue is almost 100 bugs long again. We could really use some > help here. Thanks Down to 7 now. jer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bug wrangler queue is large...

2010-07-15 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 7/15/10 3:50 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > The queue is almost 100 bugs long again. We could really use some help here. Please consider putting some info on the "Staffing needs" page. I think it really helps more to have a systematic solution than to alert people periodically. Paweł signatur

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bug wrangler queue is large...

2010-07-15 Thread Markos Chandras
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09:27:08AM +, Duncan wrote: > Jeroen Roovers posted on Wed, 26 May 2010 05:08:44 +0200 as excerpted: > > > On Tue, 25 May 2010 23:40:44 +0200 > > Harald van Dijk wrote: > > > >> Yes, people like myself who don't normally wrangle bugs but try to help > >> out occasional

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bug wrangler queue is large...

2010-05-26 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Wed, 26 May 2010 09:27:08 + (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > I've often wished there was a way to flag a bug as "I'm not thru > messing with it yet, don't mail anyone yet." That's especially true > when I know I'm going to be attaching 2-3 addition files, emerge > --info, build

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bug wrangler queue is large...

2010-05-26 Thread Alec Warner
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Jeroen Roovers posted on Wed, 26 May 2010 05:08:44 +0200 as excerpted: > >> On Tue, 25 May 2010 23:40:44 +0200 >> Harald van Dijk wrote: >> >>> Yes, people like myself who don't normally wrangle bugs but try to help >>> out occ

[gentoo-dev] Re: bug wrangler queue is large...

2010-05-26 Thread Duncan
Jeroen Roovers posted on Wed, 26 May 2010 05:08:44 +0200 as excerpted: > On Tue, 25 May 2010 23:40:44 +0200 > Harald van Dijk wrote: > >> Yes, people like myself who don't normally wrangle bugs but try to help >> out occasionally. I'm not really interested in receiving all bug >> wrangler e-mails

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bug wrangler queue is large...

2010-05-26 Thread Matti Bickel
On 05/26/2010 11:01 AM, Duncan wrote: [Reopening on RESO FIXED bugs as non-reporter] > That's what clone bug is for... or at least what /I/ use it for. Resulting in extra work for wranglers. At least for the packages I maintain, I actually read my bugmail and will respond to comments even in RESO

[gentoo-dev] Re: bug wrangler queue is large...

2010-05-26 Thread Duncan
Graham Murray posted on Wed, 26 May 2010 06:36:35 +0100 as excerpted: > Mike Frysinger writes: > >> the bug reporter can open their own bugs. gentoo developers can open >> any bug. that's about it. > > Which can be a pain for other users who suffered the same bug (and are > probably on the CC