Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: binary packages and striping

2006-03-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 09 March 2006 09:24, Mikey wrote: > That is my point. There is nothing there to strip file a bug > yet during an install I > noticed it running scanelf on the entire 248 meg source tree. Kind of a > pointless task, not to mention extremely wasteful of resources. yes and no scanel

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: binary packages and striping

2006-03-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 21:59, MIkey wrote: > Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > > skype, blackdown-jdk, rar, opera, openoffice-bin, they are all stripped > > by upstream, but passes through portage's prepstrip, so they get stripped > > again and the missing debug info is tried to be copied in /

[gentoo-dev] Re: binary packages and striping

2006-03-08 Thread MIkey
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > skype, blackdown-jdk, rar, opera, openoffice-bin, they are all stripped by > upstream, but passes through portage's prepstrip, so they get stripped > again and the missing debug info is tried to be copied in /usr/lib/debug. Might want to skip stripping gentoo-s