On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:43:53AM +, Martin Vaeth wrote:
> Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> >
> > Indeed. The general gentoo policy is that "trivial" files such as bash-
> > completions, systemd unit files, etc, aren't to be install-controlled via
> > USE flags
>
> Then why is bash-com
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> Indeed. The general gentoo policy is that "trivial" files such as bash-
> completions, systemd unit files, etc, aren't to be install-controlled via
> USE flags
Then why is bash-completion still a global USE-flag?
Those few cases where it has a different ef
Michał Górny posted on Mon, 09 Sep 2013 17:18:50 +0200 as excerpted:
> Dnia 2013-09-09, o godz. 18:12:08 Nikos Chantziaras
> napisał(a):
>
>> On 09/09/13 13:05, Michał Górny wrote:
>> >
>> > Trying plain:
>> >
>> >complete -r git
>> >
>> > it removes git completion indeed. But when I type 'g
Dnia 2013-09-09, o godz. 18:12:08
Nikos Chantziaras napisał(a):
> On 09/09/13 13:05, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Dnia 2013-09-09, o godz. 12:50:03
> > Samuli Suominen napisał(a):
> >
> >> On 09/09/13 12:24, Michał Górny wrote:
> >>> 1. how to properly disable completions the 'new way'?
> >>
> >> som
On 09/09/13 13:05, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-09-09, o godz. 12:50:03
Samuli Suominen napisał(a):
On 09/09/13 12:24, Michał Górny wrote:
1. how to properly disable completions the 'new way'?
something like
http://blog.onetechnical.com/2012/06/19/disable-bash-autocompletion-on-ubunt/
shou
