Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Time based retirements

2012-12-21 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 17:57:44 +0100 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > > If someone has at some point contributed to Gentoo then why not let > > them keep their user around, should they want to come back. Of > > course this doesn't work retroactively, but I think it would be a > > cool tip of the hat to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Time based retirements

2012-12-21 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 21/12/2012 17:16, Peter Stuge wrote: > Leave the account but simply block access. One example implementation > is to move the SSH key to another location, and have a lightweight > method to move it back in place, with an absolute minimum of human > interaction and required time. Done. I love ho

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Time based retirements

2012-12-21 Thread Peter Stuge
Markos Chandras wrote: > > I'm really just trying to understand the sense in this. > > -- > > Doug Goldstein > > Your tone is not appropriate for discussion. Sorry Markos, I disagree with you. Doug makes it abundantly clear that he wants to understand. I think we can all recognize that, in partic

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Time based retirements

2012-12-21 Thread Markos Chandras
On 21 December 2012 06:09, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Rich Freeman posted on Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:33:55 -0500 as excerpted: > >> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Doug Goldstein >> wrote: >>> I could MAYBE understand it if they're consuming some valuable resource >>> that we need to fre

[gentoo-dev] Re: Time based retirements

2012-12-20 Thread Duncan
Rich Freeman posted on Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:33:55 -0500 as excerpted: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Doug Goldstein > wrote: >> I could MAYBE understand it if they're consuming some valuable resource >> that we need to free up by retiring them. But instead they get a >> nasty-gram about their