Rich Freeman wrote:
> >> Nor should Gentoo projects suddenly change what they are because
> >> "the internet" doesn't understand them. That's a ridiculous basis
> >> for any change.
> >
> > It doesn't always matter what others think, but it is always worth
> > considering. It matters a lot for how
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Steven J. Long wrote:
>> Nor should Gentoo projects suddenly change what they are because
>> "the internet" doesn't understand them. That's a ridiculous basis
>> for any change.
>
> It doesn't always matter what others think, but it is always
Steven J. Long wrote:
> Nor should Gentoo projects suddenly change what they are because
> "the internet" doesn't understand them. That's a ridiculous basis
> for any change.
If a friend whom I care about and respect tells me that they don't
understand something I do then I try to consider if mayb
On 19/11/2012 08:52, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Not a bad idea, with a corresponding eselect tool to control what kind
> of initramfs you have (dracut, genkernel, none,
> remind-me-but-I-roll-my-own, etc). The ebuild would just call the
> function, and the function would handle it accordingly.
Glad to
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
>
> Debian / Ubuntu have a tool that basically does this. Its
> update-initramfs. I believe it is called from..the postinst of
> packages that are supposed to be in the initramfs? honestly I'd have
> to look up how they implemented it.
Not a ba
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Steven J. Long
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 05:16:18PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> I'm still happy enough with building udev out from systemd tree and
>> letting sep. /usr consept from 90s to finally die in favour of
>> simplifying the system.
>
> It's fr
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 05:16:18PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> I'm still happy enough with building udev out from systemd tree and
> letting sep. /usr consept from 90s to finally die in favour of
> simplifying the system.
It's from a lot earlier than the 90s. Perhaps we should get rid of pi
On Sun, 2012-11-18 at 17:19 +, Duncan wrote:
> Diego Elio Pettenò posted on Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:47:22 -0800 as excerpted:
>
> > On 18/11/2012 07:43, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
> >> And, by the way, I doubt, that people "laugh" about eudev (previously
> >> named udev-ng) creation. Mostly
Diego Elio Pettenò posted on Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:47:22 -0800 as excerpted:
> On 18/11/2012 07:43, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
>> And, by the way, I doubt, that people "laugh" about eudev (previously
>> named udev-ng) creation. Mostly they just can't understand why gentoo
>> devs created third
Rich Freeman posted on Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:26:17 -0500 as excerpted:
> I'm sure all of the options will be offered as options for as long as
> people care to take care of them. With the number of anti-systemd posts
> on -dev I don't see openrc going away anytime soon.
>
> I'm sure the default wi
Alec Warner wrote:
> Fabio Erculiani wrote:
>> I think expressing my own opinion about Lennart-made software is my
>> right, after all.
>> Firstly, it's almost impossible nowadays to avoid including avahi,
>> systemd and pulseaudio into a desktop distro so, there is no real
>> choice. This issue
Greg KH wrote:
> Steven J Long wrote:
>> And that is what we were discussing: possible future coupling between the
>> two, which is much easier to do when the sources are part of the
>> same package.
..
>> OFC you could just assure us that udev will never rely on systemd as a
>> design decision.
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:59:22AM +, Duncan wrote
> It may very well be that a fork is thus required. I guess we wait and
> see. But I don't see the kde folks being willingly subsumed into a
> gnomeos black hole, and time and again, floss history has demonstrated
> that when there's an i
Duncan posted on Fri, 11 May 2012 00:59:22 + as excerpted:
> Fabio Erculiani posted on Thu, 10 May 2012 22:48:29 +0200 as excerpted:
>
>> On a side note, I find it quite odd to be accused of trash talking by
>> Linux Kernel people.
>
> hwoarang is a kernel person?
FWIW, I see the gregkh pos
David Leverton posted on Thu, 10 May 2012 19:57:30 +0100 as excerpted:
> Greg KH wrote:
>> No one forces you to use any of this software if you do not want to.
>> There are lots of other operating systems out there, feel free to
>> switch to them if you do not like the way this one is working out,
Fabio Erculiani posted on Thu, 10 May 2012 22:48:29 +0200 as excerpted:
> On a side note, I find it quite odd to be accused of trash talking by
> Linux Kernel people.
hwoarang is a kernel person?
If you note, gregkh didn't post that. I can't agree with udev/systemd
integration, but it's worth
16 matches
Mail list logo
