Duncan wrote:
> (Hmm... my client's warning says I'm not verbose enough, too much quoted
> text for my reply. /That/ doesn't happen very often! After adding this
> note it's the "continue anyway" button. =:^)
Here is a friendly reminder for everyone;
Please remove more quoted text. Full-quote
Michał Górny posted on Thu, 07 Aug 2014 18:03:18 +0200 as excerpted:
> Dnia 2014-08-07, o godz. 15:37:07 Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net>
> napisał(a):
>
>> 6. dev-libs/bar -- if any version of bar is acceptable, and you
>> need to rebuild bar only when changing slots (but not subslots).
>>
>> Can
Dnia 2014-08-07, o godz. 15:37:07
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> napisał(a):
> Michał Górny posted on Thu, 07 Aug 2014 11:24:43 +0200 as excerpted:
>
> > With the new policy, the simple form of dependencies:
> >
> > dev-libs/foo
> >
> > would be only allowed if dev-libs/foo has only one slot.
Michał Górny posted on Thu, 07 Aug 2014 11:24:43 +0200 as excerpted:
> With the new policy, the simple form of dependencies:
>
> dev-libs/foo
>
> would be only allowed if dev-libs/foo has only one slot.
>
> If the atom matches more than one slot of a package, one of the
> following forms woul
Dnia 2014-08-07, o godz. 11:41:31
Ulrich Mueller napisał(a):
> > On Thu, 7 Aug 2014, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Since the tree is still full of too broad dependencies and other
> > mistakes, I would like to add a repoman check and a matching QA
> > policy regarding how slots should be used in
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2014, Michał Górny wrote:
> Since the tree is still full of too broad dependencies and other
> mistakes, I would like to add a repoman check and a matching QA
> policy regarding how slots should be used in dependencies.
> The check would apply to EAPI 5 and newer ebuilds only.
