Dnia 2014-06-26, o godz. 00:48:02
Jörg Schaible napisał(a):
> hasufell wrote:
>
> > Kristian Fiskerstrand:
> >> On 06/24/2014 09:25 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> >>> Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> >>
> On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 22:15 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> > So, why the heck, was the de
On 25/06/14 06:42 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Except if they're locally hard masked ... ;-)
there's nothing we can do if you intentionally break your own system
>> In that case I think revbump is not warranted since it should continue
>> to work for existing installation and new installations shou
hasufell wrote:
> Jörg Schaible:
>> Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 22:15 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
So, why the heck, was the dependency to dev-libs/glib changed for an
existing ebuild without increasing its version (e.g.
dbus-glib-0.100.2-r2)?
>>>
>>> Pl
hasufell wrote:
> Kristian Fiskerstrand:
>> On 06/24/2014 09:25 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>> Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
>>
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 22:15 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> So, why the heck, was the dependency to dev-libs/glib changed
> for an existing ebuild without increas
Jan Matejka wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:25:40 +0200
> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
>> Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 22:15 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> >> So, why the heck, was the dependency to dev-libs/glib chan
