Kent Fredric schrieb:
> firmware-video/ati-firmware
> firmware-video/ati
>
> and any category name with "Firmware" in it, will result in lots of
> redundant names exposed to users/deps if the package /also/ has
> firmware in the name.
Indeed, but this redundancy already exists in tree, e.g. dev-l
On 26 July 2012 19:32, Michał Górny wrote:
> But you are aware that this is *upstream* naming?
>
> Similarly, ati-drivers (which is not upstream naming :P)
> and nvidia-drivers don't follow the suite.
I wasn't aware of that, but thats beside the point I was trying to
make. Its just a mechanism th
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 06:03:53 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn posted on Wed, 25 Jul 2012 21:58:30
> +0200 as excerpted:
>
> > Kent Fredric schrieb:
> >> On 23 July 2012 08:48, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
> >> wrote:
> >>> I do see some advantage of the
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn posted on Wed, 25 Jul 2012 21:58:30 +0200 as
excerpted:
> Kent Fredric schrieb:
>> On 23 July 2012 08:48, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
>> wrote:
>>> I do see some advantage of the current way of putting the
>>> firmware in the category of what it is for...
>>
>> If you w
