Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC Bugzilla interaction guide for devs & editbugs users

2010-09-11 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 07:17:01 + (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Jeroen Roovers posted on Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:32:38 +0200 as excerpted: > > > If the reason you propose this is visibility, then maybe we should > > make the quicksearch option include more than just open bugs. I've >

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC Bugzilla interaction guide for devs & editbugs users

2010-09-11 Thread Duncan
Jeroen Roovers posted on Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:32:38 +0200 as excerpted: > If the reason you propose this is visibility, then maybe we should make > the quicksearch option include more than just open bugs. I've thought > about having UPSTREAM/DUPLICATE/INVALID added so that bugzilla users can > more

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC Bugzilla interaction guide for devs & editbugs users

2010-09-07 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 22:53:22 + (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Pacho Ramos posted on Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:05:34 +0200 as excerpted: > > > El mié, 08-09-2010 a las 01:44 +0400, dev-ran...@mail.ru escribió: > >> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:30:34PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > >> >

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC Bugzilla interaction guide for devs & editbugs users

2010-09-07 Thread Duncan
Pacho Ramos posted on Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:05:34 +0200 as excerpted: > El mié, 08-09-2010 a las 01:44 +0400, dev-ran...@mail.ru escribió: >> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:30:34PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: >> > This implies that the upstream is alive enough to fix it. >> > >> > I feel it should m

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC Bugzilla interaction guide for devs & editbugs users

2010-09-06 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 10:39:59 +0200 Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:32, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > After a discussion on IRC, a few of us were considering the value of > > adding suggestions on handling of bugs in Bugzilla from a developer (and > > editbugs user) perspective. >

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC Bugzilla interaction guide for devs & editbugs users

2010-09-06 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Michael Weber : > What about user issued KEYWORD/STABLE-REQ on maintainer-nee...@g.o > assignd bugs/packages? > > Close as RESO/WONTFIX or add the arches? Common sense. Practice has been to add arches if it fixes a problem in a current stable, if there is no stable version available or the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC Bugzilla interaction guide for devs & editbugs users

2010-09-06 Thread Alex Legler
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 14:10:41 +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Hi, > > "Robin H. Johnson" : > > 2.2. Security bugs > > The developer should comment, but ONLY members of the security > > team should: > > - change whiteboard > > - add/remove arches > > As security may be grateful for any

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC Bugzilla interaction guide for devs & editbugs users

2010-09-06 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, "Robin H. Johnson" : > 2.2. Security bugs > The developer should comment, but ONLY members of the security team > should: > - change whiteboard > - add/remove arches As security may be grateful for any kind of help, those two actions is often done by the maintainers. V-Li -- Chris