-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 06/07/15 um 17:08 schrieb Michał Górny:
> Hello, developers.
>
[snip]
> Sadly, there are two problems with using Ninja:
>
> 1) it will not work with some packages,
>
[snip]
>
> So, what do you think? Should I start switching random packages
Franz Fellner wrote:
>
> IMHO a working build system
> always is better than a fast but potentially broken one :)
Meanwhile, it is not so clear which of the two systems
is more likely the "potentially broken" one:
According to some of the mentioned bugs, it appears to me
that some upstreams consi
Christoph Junghans posted on Sun, 07 Jun 2015 20:08:25 -0600 as excerpted:
> 2015-06-07 14:19 GMT-06:00 Justin Lecher (jlec) :
>>
>> On 07/06/15 22:14, Johannes Huber wrote:
>>
>>> Am Sonntag 07 Juni 2015, 17:08:57 schrieb Michał Górny:
>>>
CMake sucks a lot [but will suck less if we switch]
2015-06-07 14:19 GMT-06:00 Justin Lecher (jlec) :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 07/06/15 22:14, Johannes Huber wrote:
>> Am Sonntag 07 Juni 2015, 17:08:57 schrieb Michał Górny:
>>> Hello, developers.
>>
>> Hello Michal,
>>
>>> As you probably know already, CMake sucks a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/06/15 22:14, Johannes Huber wrote:
> Am Sonntag 07 Juni 2015, 17:08:57 schrieb Michał Górny:
>> Hello, developers.
>
> Hello Michal,
>
>> As you probably know already, CMake sucks a lot. One of its more
>> sucky features is that it generates
Am Sonntag 07 Juni 2015, 17:08:57 schrieb Michał Górny:
> Hello, developers.
Hello Michal,
> As you probably know already, CMake sucks a lot. One of its more sucky
> features is that it generates Makefiles that fail a lot. In particular,
> they fail at verbose build logs that are cluttered with u
