On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:54 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 07/12/2010 12:56 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>
>> I remember very clearly as you and I were both council members at the
>> time. My point is that this discussion does not need to even happen
>> and the council shouldn't even remotely be invol
On 07/12/2010 12:56 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> I remember very clearly as you and I were both council members at the
> time. My point is that this discussion does not need to even happen
> and the council shouldn't even remotely be involved here.
>
I assumed the best way to change policy would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11-07-2010 21:56, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi Doug.
>>
> Jorge,
>
> I remember very clearly as you and I were both counc
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Doug.
>
> On 11-07-2010 16:03, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>>> On 07/11/2010 08:02 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>>>
If I
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 07:47:24PM +0300, Petteri RRRty wrote:
> On 07/11/2010 07:37 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>
> >
> >> Simply put, the council's purpose is not to say "oh we have to stop
> >> development and have a 4 week debate about everything minor". The
> >> council's purpose i
On 07/11/2010 07:37 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>
>> Simply put, the council's purpose is not to say "oh we have to stop
>> development and have a 4 week debate about everything minor". The
>> council's purpose is to help decide between different technical
>> solutions and encourage peo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Doug.
On 11-07-2010 16:03, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> On 07/11/2010 08:02 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>>
>>> If I really need to go to the council with every change, considering
>>> it must be deb
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 07/11/2010 08:02 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>
>> If I really need to go to the council with every change, considering
>> it must be debated on the ML for at least X number of days prior to
>> going to the council, I'd more likely just remove
On 07/11/2010 08:02 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> If I really need to go to the council with every change, considering
> it must be debated on the ML for at least X number of days prior to
> going to the council, I'd more likely just remove MythTV from the tree
> and maintain it in an overlay. I don
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 01:34:37 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 09:30:42AM +0300, Petteri RRRty wrote:
>> > The standing policy is still not to remove any public functionality from
>> > eclasses. If we decide to start rem
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 01:34:37 -0700
Brian Harring wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 09:30:42AM +0300, Petteri RRRty wrote:
> > The standing policy is still not to remove any public functionality from
> > eclasses. If we decide to start removing functionality the council
> > should set common rules
11 matches
Mail list logo
