On 09/20/2010 12:00 AM, Duncan wrote:
> Given that no set eapi is taken to be eapi=0, and this is proposed as part
> of a new eapi, eapi MUST be set before pkg-inherit, if pkg-inherit and
> thus per-pkg eclasses are to be used at all. The last sentence of the top
> paragraph (of the two) should
Matti Bickel posted on Sun, 19 Sep 2010 21:14:56 +0200 as excerpted:
> It is made a requirement that per-package eclasses can not modify the
> ``EAPI`` variable. It is assumed ``EAPI``, if it set, is set before
> calling pkg-inherit.
>
> Backwards Compatibility
> ===
>
> The
