Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: News: systemd sysv-utils blocker resolution

2017-12-27 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 05:18:11PM +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote: > > > On 12/27/17 16:47, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Robin H. Johnson > > wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 11:22:50PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > >>> You might want to mention that alternativ

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: News: systemd sysv-utils blocker resolution

2017-12-27 Thread Francesco Riosa
On 12/27/17 16:47, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 11:22:50PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: >>> You might want to mention that alternatively, uninstalling >>> openrc&sysvinit&netifrc on a systemd profile system is fine

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: News: systemd sysv-utils blocker resolution

2017-12-27 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > You might want to mention that alternatively, uninstalling > openrc&sysvinit&netifrc on a systemd profile system is fine to do > these days, despite the warning. I have added the following text after the third paragraph. Let me know if

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: News: systemd sysv-utils blocker resolution

2017-12-27 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 11:22:50PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: >> You might want to mention that alternatively, uninstalling >> openrc&sysvinit&netifrc on a systemd profile system is fine to do >> these days, despite the warning. > If

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: News: systemd sysv-utils blocker resolution

2017-12-26 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 11:22:50PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > You might want to mention that alternatively, uninstalling > openrc&sysvinit&netifrc on a systemd profile system is fine to do > these days, despite the warning. If you're using netifrc's systemd support, this would break your ne

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: News: systemd sysv-utils blocker resolution

2017-12-26 Thread Ben Kohler
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > Does this still cause a warning? I thought that openrc/sysvinit were > now pulled in via a virtual these days (alongside systemd), and were > not directly in @system. Or do we still have functions.sh issues? > > -- > Rich > Still throws war

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: News: systemd sysv-utils blocker resolution

2017-12-26 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > You might want to mention that alternatively, uninstalling > openrc&sysvinit&netifrc on a systemd profile system is fine to do > these days, despite the warning. > Does this still cause a warning? I thought that openrc/sysvinit were no

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: News: systemd sysv-utils blocker resolution

2017-12-26 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
You might want to mention that alternatively, uninstalling openrc&sysvinit&netifrc on a systemd profile system is fine to do these days, despite the warning.

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: News: systemd sysv-utils blocker resolution

2017-12-24 Thread Duncan
Mike Gilbert posted on Sun, 24 Dec 2017 19:38:30 -0500 as excerpted: > There has been a bit of confusion over a change I made recently. I would > like to publish a news item before the relevant version of systemd is > marked stable. > > Any suggestions are welcome. > > -- > > Title: systemd sys